Search for: "State v. Austin" Results 601 - 620 of 2,906
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2010, 1:05 pm by Erin Miller
  Last term in Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District No. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 8:00 am
Clearing House (08-453) — state power to enforce state laws against racial bias in mortgage lending Wed., April 29: Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District v. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 9:00 pm by Austin Sarat
Instead, 1968 marked the first year of an unofficial moratorium on executions in the lead-up to the Supreme Court’s 1972 Furman v Georgia decision. [read post]
27 Dec 2015, 11:55 pm by Amy Howe
’” At the IMLA Appellate Practice Blog, Lisa Soronen discusses the amicus brief that the State and Local Legal Center filed in Heffernan v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 8:12 pm by D. Todd Smith
Connally Center at the University of Texas School of Law here in Austin. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 8:12 pm by D. Todd Smith
Connally Center at the University of Texas School of Law here in Austin. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 10:26 pm
" And in commentary, online at Slate, Mark Joseph Stern has a jurisprudence essay titled "Texas Messes With Marriage Equality: The state Supreme Court's refusal to extend state spousal benefits to same-sex couples is an insidious attempt to defy Obergefell v. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 6:24 am by David Markus
  After a strenuous debate earlier in the week (Jordan v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 9:00 am by Karen Tani
Ross (Cumberland School of Law, Samford University) reviews Marc Lendler, Gitlow v. [read post]
26 Jul 2020, 6:09 am by Mark S. Humphreys
  Here is a case from the Western District of Texas, Austin Division, dealing with this issue. [read post]
The court found that the lawsuit was barred under res judicata because of it’s similarity to Fisher v. [read post]
14 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
”This conception of clemency is continuous with a line of cases going back to the first United States Supreme Court case on clemency in 1833.That case, United States v. [read post]