Search for: "State v. Austin"
Results 641 - 660
of 2,927
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2018, 3:01 am
Department of Justice changes sides in Lucia v. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 10:48 am
That changed abruptly in 2017 with the Supreme Court’s decision in TC Heartland LLC v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Virginia State v. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 2:13 pm
Austin v Southwark LBC is being heard in the Supreme Court tomorrow - Wednesday 21 April - and Thursday, for starters), I thought we might take a look at the main parties' manifesto commitments on housing and housing law related issues. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 2:13 pm
Austin v Southwark LBC is being heard in the Supreme Court tomorrow - Wednesday 21 April - and Thursday, for starters), I thought we might take a look at the main parties' manifesto commitments on housing and housing law related issues. [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 3:43 am
United States, in which it is considering whether a conspiracy to commit extortion requires the conspirators to agree to obtain property from someone outside the conspiracy, and the arbitration case DIRECTV v. [read post]
21 May 2009, 1:02 am
The court of appeals tethers this holding to Klapesky v. [read post]
27 Oct 2021, 5:59 am
In the second case, United Food & Commercial Workers Union & Participating Food Industry Employers Tri-State Pension Fund v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 11:00 am
In the Austin decision, the Court upheld the power of government to bar corporations from using funds from their own treasuries to support or oppose candidates for elected state offices. [read post]
13 Nov 2022, 9:00 pm
Austin Sarat is the William Nelson Cromwell Professor of Jurisprudence and Political Science at Amherst College. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 8:00 am
Hana v. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 4:45 am
After the Roe v. [read post]
18 May 2018, 4:50 am
P’ship v. [read post]
18 Aug 2024, 9:01 pm
’”Before the Supreme Court’s 1972 decision in Furman v. [read post]
6 May 2009, 4:00 am
State v. [read post]
25 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
Constitution, including most notably the Equal Protection Clause.As noted in Bush v Gore, a state’s determination shall be “conclusive” only if made pursuant to a law “made prior to election day” by which the “state legislature has provided for final determination of contests or controversies . . . . [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 9:20 am
As Justice Thomas noted in his partial dissent in Northwest Austin Municipal District No. 1 v. [read post]
24 Sep 2007, 6:19 am
State v. [read post]
19 Jun 2010, 10:12 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 7:49 am
Affirmed.Case Name: VILLAGE ROAD COALITION v. [read post]