Search for: "State v. Austin" Results 81 - 100 of 2,904
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Sep 2023, 6:30 am
CalSTRS Escalates Efforts to Hold Global Companies Accountable for Not Adequately Disclosing Climate Change Risks Posted by Rebecca Forée, and Aeisha Mastagni, California State Teachers’ Retirement System, on Friday, August 25, 2023 Tags: Board of Directors, CalSTRS, Climate change, Proxy season SEC’s New Rules on Use of Data Analytics by Broker-Dealers and Investment Advisers Posted by Hardy Callcott, Jay Baris and Laurie Kleiman, Sidley Austin LLP, on… [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 5:50 am by Tobias Lutzi
The Supreme Court can, like previously the House of Lords, depart from precedent in line with the Practice Statement [1966] 1 WLR 1234 (see Austin v Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Southwark [2010] UKSC 28, at [25]), but the Supreme Court is very hesitant to do so in order to maintain legal certainty and predictability. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 5:55 am by Mark Nevitt
Tuberville disagrees with the Pentagon’s reproductive health care access policy that was issued following the Supreme Court’s Dobbs v. [read post]
22 Jul 2023, 12:22 pm by John Floyd
District Court Judge Lee Yeakel, who sat in Austin before his May 31, 2023 retirement. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:45 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Out-of-state employers, insurers, employee benefit plan vendors, and other businesses registered to do business in Pennsylvania, Georgia, Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, or another state that requires that out-of-state businesses consent to jurisdiction as a condition of their registration to do business in the state face a heightened risk of getting hauled into court in the consent to jurisdiction state following last month’s Supreme Court decision in… [read post]