Search for: "State v. Austria"
Results 1 - 20
of 693
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2010, 9:44 pm
Frodl v Austria (Application no. 20201/04) 8 April 2010 – Read judgment The European Court of Human Rights has taken another opportunity to criticise a European state for not allowing a prisoner, in this case convicted of murder, to vote. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 5:03 pm
C-28/09, European Commission v. [read post]
11 May 2015, 4:24 pm
In the case of Armellini v Austria (Judgment of 16 April 2015) the First Section of the Court of Human Rights dismissed an Article 10 complaint by applicants who had been found guilty of defaming professional footballers by accusing them of taking bribes. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 2:01 am
In Robathin v Austria, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) scrutinized a search and seizure in a law office in light of article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 1:06 am
In Fürst-Pfeifer v Austria, the majority of the Fourth Section of the ECtHR ruled that the applicant’s right to private life was outweighed by the freedom of expression of an online publication and offline newspaper. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 2:12 am
In Canada, the Supreme Court ruledin Equustek v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 4:08 am
Schalk and Kopf v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 1:14 pm
The judgment came in the CASE OF SCHALK AND KOPF v. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 2:45 pm
In Abitron Austria GmbH, et al., v. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 2:45 pm
In Abitron Austria GmbH, et al., v. [read post]
4 Dec 2015, 11:18 am
They include Kirkham v. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 12:52 am
In the case of Ärztekammer für Wien and Dorner v Austria ([2016] ECHR 179) the Fourth Section of the Court of Human Rights held that an injunction prohibiting a doctors’ leader from criticising a company which provided private health care was not an unjustified interference with his Article 10 rights. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 9:15 am
Supreme Court on the issues at play in Abitron Austria GmbH v. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 9:15 am
Supreme Court on the issues at play in Abitron Austria GmbH v. [read post]
6 Mar 2009, 3:02 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Divsion) Lediaev v Vallen [2009] EWCA Civ 156 (05 March 2009) High Court (Administrative Court) Stanley v Secretary of State for Communities & Local Government & Ors [2009] EWHC 404 (Admin) (04 March 2009) Von Der Pahlen v Leoben High Court, Austria [2009] EWHC 383 (Admin) (04 March 2009) Capel Parish Council v Surrey County Council [...] [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 4:01 am
According to Tribunal V, the difference between an aggressive war and an invasion was that the latter did not involve armed resistance: [A]n invasion of one state by another is the implementation of the national policy of the invading state by force even though the invaded state, due to fear or a sense of the futility of resistance in the face of superior force, adopts a policy of nonresistance and thus prevents the occurrence of any actual combat. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 8:39 am
On June 29, 2023, in Abitron Austria GmbH v. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 2:23 pm
On October 5, 2015, the Supreme Court heard oral argument inOBB Personenverkehr AG v. [read post]
Balancing freedom of expression against the right to private life - Kurier Zeitungsverlag v. Austria
24 Jun 2012, 1:37 am
In Kurier Zeitungsverlag und Druckerei GmbH v. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 7:21 pm
On December 1, 2015, the Supreme Court decided OBB Personenverkehr AG v. [read post]
