Search for: "State v. Baca"
Results 81 - 100
of 117
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2015, 8:01 am
Rule 16(a)(6) is a catchall clause that requires the government to “[a]dvise the defendant’s attorney of evidence favorable to the defendant and material to the defendant’s guilt or punishment to which defendant is entitled pursuant to Brady and United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 9:05 pm
Times, Ronald Collins/Concurring Opinions, video from Baca v. [read post]
8 Feb 2015, 9:34 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 7:09 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, opined that there was an "epidemic" of Brady violations (referring to a failure by prosecutors to turn over exculpatory evidence), and suggested that this was a systemic problem that was further enabled by the chronic failure of judges to punish the offending prosecutors.IPicking up where he had left off, Judge Kozinski, joined by two colleagues in an argument in Baca v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 3:33 am
In other words, Judge Kopf’s post of the 9th Circuit oral argument in Baca v. [read post]
24 Jan 2015, 10:42 am
Watch and listen to oral argument in Baca v. [read post]
24 Jan 2015, 7:47 am
The video of oral argument before the 9th Circuit in Baca v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 8:43 pm
Sidney Powell, writing in the New York Observer, tells the story.This case, Baca v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 1:37 pm
United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Comment k could correspond to Led Zeppelin, and state of the art might be The Who.And it seems that, for each of these bands, there’s a song we really like that gets slighted (in our opinion) when it comes to air time on classic rock stations. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 4:09 am
United States (2012) 133 S.Ct. 511, in which the Supreme Court rejected an argument that temporarily flooding someone's property cannot qualify as a taking, as a matter of law. [read post]
New Mexico COA Affirms State Conviction of Navajo Member for Crime on Navajo Fee Land (Baca Chapter)
13 Aug 2012, 5:31 am
Here is the opinion in State v. [read post]
4 Aug 2012, 2:54 pm
Baca, 400 F.3d 1152 (9th Cir. 2005), and United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 2:51 pm
According to a press release, the bill seeks to (i) ensure that a third party doesn’t gain control of a consumer’s account through remotely created checks, (ii) allow consumers to cancel a debit in connection with a small-dollar loan, (iii) require all lenders, including banks, to abide by a state’s rules for small-dollar, payday-like loans they offer customers in the state, (iv) ban lead generators and anonymously registered payday lending websites, and… [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 5:15 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 10:49 am
" In 1963, the United States Supreme Court held in the landmark case of Brady v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 11:48 am
The bill comes in response to a recent decision by the Maryland Court of Appeals in DeWolfe v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 9:12 am
Although binding precedent holds that our state courts do not have jurisdiction over such matters, see Hartley v. [read post]
4 May 2012, 11:34 am
• The 25th Anniversary of McCleskey v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 10:57 am
Virginia v. [read post]
