Search for: "State v. Bailey" Results 281 - 300 of 911
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Oct 2008, 4:31 pm
United States Secret Service, 36 F.3d 457 (5th Cir. 1994), United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 8:00 am by Erin Sutton
The 20 states’ Attorneys General, who were led by Attorney General Andrew Bailey of Missouri, alleged that any online dispensing of medications used for abortion would not only violate their states’ laws, but also would possibly implicate the federal Comstock Act, which was enacted in 1873 and prohibits the mailing of “[e]very article or thing designed, adapted, or intended for producing abortion,” as well as “[e]very article, instrument,… [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 3:31 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Rakib, R v [2011] EWCA Crim 870 (01 April 2011) Adam & Anor, R v [2011] EWCA Crim 865 (01 April 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Owens v Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council [2011] EWCA Civ 359 (31 March 2011) Haresign v Clydesdale Bank Plc (t/a Yorkshire Bank) [2011] EWCA Civ 344 (01 April 2011) Eliassen & Anor v Eliassen & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 361 (01 April 2011) Chater, R (on the application of)… [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
The phone hacking trial continued at the Old Bailey this week, with evidence being heard on Monday 13 January, Tuesday 14 January and Wednesday 15 January. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 7:51 pm
Having held that a premises rule is workable in (Bailey v. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 8:50 am by Andrew Delaney
Supreme Court set up a procedure in Anders v. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 1:29 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In the following guest post, Tony Kriesel, Claims Specialist with IQUW; Elan Kandel, a Member of the Bailey Cavalieri law firm; and James Talbert, an Associate at Bailey Cavalieri, take a look at the reasons for the pharmaceutical industry’s high securities litigation frequency experience and at the implications of the lawsuit frequency for pharmaceutical companies and their insurers. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 12:12 am by John Diekman
The rule bars both repetitive motions to dismiss a pleading pursuant CPLR 3211(a), as well as subsequent motions to dismiss that pleading pursuant to CPLR 3211(a) that are based on alternative grounds.Case:  Bailey v. [read post]