Search for: "State v. Baldwin"
Results 341 - 360
of 426
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2010, 9:04 pm
This is the train of citations (Sidhom is not pertinent): Thomas (2002): The defendant, however, bears the ultimate burden of proving, by a preponderance of the credible evidence, that the evidence should not be used against him (see, People v Berrios, supra at 367; People v Baldwin, 25 NY2d 66, 70; People v Whitehurst, 25 NY2d 389, 391; Nardone v United States, 308 US 338, 341-342), and that the police lacked probable cause to arrest him (see,… [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 4:33 am
" Kline v [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 12:26 pm
Supreme Court decision in Bilski v. [read post]
6 Jun 2010, 9:48 pm
State v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 4:12 am
If I wanted to use the corporation, I suppose I would simply contact the state and pay the current fees and bring it back to life. [read post]
11 May 2010, 1:42 am
Bonnette v Long Island College Hosp., 3 NY3d 281 (2004); Hallock v State of New York, 64 NY2d 224 (1984). [read post]
8 May 2010, 1:29 pm
Bishop v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 4:04 am
" Baldwin v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 1:08 pm
As this court explained in State v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 10:26 am
See, e.g., Baldwin Graphic Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 5:10 am
Pignataro shall remain an employee of the District.* In a separate document, dated July 16, 2009, Pignataro signed a letter of resignation stating that "I hereby submit my letter of resignation from the position of custodian for the Baldwin Schools, effective at the close of business on August 12, 2009. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 9:15 pm
” [via FindLaw] State v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 12:48 pm
But United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 1:03 pm
Price v. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 7:00 am
Liggett Co. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2010, 4:07 am
” Justice Baldwin’s opinion was joined by Justices Castille, Saylor and Eakin. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 11:41 am
What preposterous ignorance of the commenter to state that "Dick Risk and his ilk have driven out Hartford Life". [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 12:27 am
" The case is Kilker v. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 1:46 pm
The case is Kilker v. [read post]
12 Sep 2009, 10:28 am
Not mentioned, but also quite relevant, is Lopiano v. [read post]
