Search for: "State v. Ball" Results 41 - 60 of 2,332
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Sep 2009, 4:10 am
Employees assume the risks inherent in performing the duties of their positionWitkowski v Milwaukee County, USCA 7th Circuit, 480. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 5:59 am by Employment Services
On June 25, 2012, the United States Supreme Court agreed to consider Vance v. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 7:33 am by Tyler Green
Attorneys who advise state elected officials need no crystal ball to see what an affirmance in Gill v. [read post]
20 Sep 2022, 6:12 pm by Howard Bashman
“Republican Supreme Court to Decide If Democrats Are Allowed to Win Elections Anymore; The independent state legislature theory has been picking up steam on the right; Moore v. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 7:17 am by lawmrh
See, for instance, “The Case for Partisan Judicial Elections”, “Voters v. [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 10:16 pm by Lee Kovarsky
In other words, the state habeas proceeding is now the ball game; federally-found facts cannot be used to show that the state decision was legally unreasonable. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 9:40 am by Meg Martin
Summary of Decision issued September 22, 2010Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court.Case Name: Ball v. [read post]
9 May 2023, 2:00 am by Katharine Van Tassel
Ball (The State University of New Jersey, Rutgers), Balancing Abortion, Santa Clara L. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 10:26 am
In which, by the way, I think you'd be looking at a 5-4.That's my crystal ball for the day. [read post]