Search for: "State v. Banks" Results 141 - 160 of 15,759
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Mar 2009, 12:56 pm
Supreme Court ruling on Vaden V. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
In the alternative – if that analysis was wrong – the judge found that the decision to make and affirm the Order must be part of a process of determination of the bank’s civil rights of the kind analysed by Lord Clyde in R (Alconbury) Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment [2003] 2 AC 295 in paragraphs 145 to 160. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 1:56 am by INFORRM
In AB Bank Ltd v Abu Dhabi Commercial Bank PJSC ([2016]EWHC 2082 (Comm)), Teare J set aside a Norwich Pharmacal Order (“NPO”) made against a bank in the UAE on the basis that the court had no jurisdiction to serve the order on the bank out of the jurisdiction because none of the permitted jurisdictional gateways under Practice Direction 6B to the Civil Procedure Rules were applicable. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 2:12 pm by Daily Record Staff
Appellant Bank of America filed a Complaint and Notice of Lis Pendens against appellee Randel ... [read post]
8 Feb 2009, 5:28 am
Bank of America, the largest bank in the United States, has agreed to settle a Nationwide Class Action related to its overdraft and non-sufficient fund fee practices. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 10:15 am by Wolfgang Demino
– Austin, Aug. 23, 2018) This appeal from a summary judgment for the bank in a credit card collection case illustrates the pitfalls of consumer advocacy in the State of Texas.Taylor v. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 10:30 am by Larry Tolchinsky
State, 147 So. 3d 34, 35 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014); Bedford Computer Corp. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 5:00 am by Gene Quinn
The big banks have backed Schumer for years, which makes sense since he is the senior Senator from the States of New York, which is where all the bankers are located (i.e., on Wall Street). [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 7:41 am
Watters, in which the Supreme Court held that a state could not exercise visitorial powers over an operating subsidiary of a national bank, many thought that the Supreme Court would extend the OCC's power to near complete preemption of any state authority over national banks. [read post]
8 May 2012, 6:42 am by Andrew Crank, Olswang LLP
(i) Stanford International Bank Limited (acting by its joint liquidators) (Appellant) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office (Respondent); and (ii) Stanford International Bank (acting by its joint liquidators) (Respondent) v The Director of the Serious Fraud Office (Appellant) (Oral Hearing)   Earlier this year, the Supreme Court  heard a complex dispute arising from the collapse of Stanford International Bank (“SIB”) in early… [read post]