Search for: "State v. Barbour"
Results 1 - 20
of 65
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Nov 2019, 8:04 am
Barbour contends that ... [read post]
3 May 2016, 9:30 am
Warren Bridge and Briscoe v. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 6:01 pm
High Court Refuses to Hear Death Row Claims in Barbour v. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 11:47 am
SOURCES: 1832 art V § 10; 1869 art V § 10. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:13 am
The United States Supreme Court declined to hear an appeal from Louisiana in the case of Barbour v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 6:48 am
” The 2004 decision of Larios v. [read post]
19 Oct 2023, 2:39 pm
In that case, maybe just read the first footnote:"Originating from United States Supreme Court precedent in Barton v. [read post]
17 Jun 2007, 8:10 pm
Among the cases on last Thursday's conference was No. 06-10605, Barbour v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 5:48 am
Howe & Russell represents the petitioner in this case, which is listed without regard to its chance of being granted: Title: Barbour v. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 7:26 am
"Among the cases on last Thursday's conference was No. 06-10605, Barbour v. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 5:26 am
That’s also how that canceled check ended as a primary exhibit in the case of State of Texas v. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 5:43 am
In an en banc decision, the Fourth Circuit in Barbour v International Union, reaffirmed the rule in that Circuit for the time window for removal to federal court in a case in which there are multiple defendants. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 2:11 pm
In Barbour v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 5:49 pm
Currently before the Court is the case of Learmouth v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 12:35 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 3:20 am
In Montgomery v. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 4:54 am
Supreme Court in Troy Barbour v. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 12:24 pm
"I won't rehearse all the arguments I've made over the years as to why Article V is the worst single feature of a dysfunctional constitution and therefore distinctly "unwise. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 12:21 pm
That case is Barbour v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 9:51 am
United States v. [read post]
