Search for: "State v. Barley" Results 1 - 19 of 19
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Feb 2018, 8:59 am by Eugene Volokh
The Defendants state that the Agreement was "intentionally not docketed. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 12:36 pm
| 3-D Lego trade mark | Garcia v Google | B+ subgroup | EU trade mark reform and counterfeits in transit | French v Battistelli | US v Canada over piracy | UK Supreme Court in Starbucks |  BASCA v The Secretary of State for Business | Patent litigation, music, politics | Product placement in Japan.Never too late 50 [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 1:52 pm
The Henderson v Henderson rule did not apply for two reasons. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 4:00 am by Lyonette Louis-Jacques
– San Miguel Brewing International Limited v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 4:09 pm by Lyle Denniston
Summers of the York, Pa., firm of Barley Snyder LLC. [read post]
27 May 2012, 8:23 am by Charon QC
Jaguar Shoes v Jaguar Cars: Blame It On The Lawyers! [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 3:45 am by Russ Bensing
”  That echoed the analysis of the 11th District a few years back in State v. [read post]
30 Aug 2008, 11:57 pm
For the purpose of marketing, the USDA Agricultural Marketing Service issued a voluntary standard for grass (forage) fed marketing claims last year that states: “grass fed standard states that grass and/or forage shall be the feed source consumed for the lifetime of the ruminant animal, with the exception of milk consumed prior to weaning. [read post]