Search for: "State v. Barnes"
Results 261 - 280
of 1,880
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2019, 7:38 am
Robert Barnes of The Washington Post reports that a request by abortion providers in Louisiana to the Supreme Court for an emergency stay of a state law provides “an unexpectedly quick test on the issue for the court’s strengthened majority,” which otherwise “seems to have taken a low-key approach to this term, after an unwelcome moment in the political spotlight during the partisan brawl over [Justice Brett] Kavanaugh’s nomination. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 7:06 am
The New Jersey Supreme Court recently decided State v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 2:48 pm
State of Missouri, et al. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 3:51 am
State v. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 11:39 am
Mark Sherman of AP reports the state will likely prevail, but Robert Barnes of the WaPo reports the Court is "conflicted. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 7:01 am
Barnes, III, Joseph V. [read post]
29 May 2010, 12:05 pm
Last summer the Ninth Circuit ruled in Barnes v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 6:05 pm
" Robert Barnes of The Washington Post has this news update. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 7:36 pm
In today’s edition of The Washington Post, Robert Barnes has an article headlined “Supreme Court appears ready to say excessive fine prohibition applies to states. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 4:15 am
State v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 7:57 am
Today the US Supreme Court agreed to take up the constitutionality of the Stolen Valor Act in United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 6:54 am
Rubio v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 9:51 am
United States v. [read post]
14 May 2011, 3:49 am
In Barnes v. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 6:41 am
In The Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports on Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s remarks before an audience of incoming law students, in which she stated that “senators refusing to vote on President Obama’s nominee to the Supreme Court should recognize a president is elected for four years not three. . . [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:00 am
Sept. 21, 2006).Barnes v. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 2:00 am
The post <em>Wilson et al. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 1:30 am
Barnes, 993 F.2d 680, 683-84 (9th Cir.1993) (defendant bears the burden of persuasion); United States v. [read post]
26 May 2022, 12:48 pm
Nor does the fact that the temporary prior restraint is entered by a state trial judge rather than an administrative censor sufficiently distinguish this case from Freedman v. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 8:49 am
Publisher/Speaker claim: Citing Barnes, the court says content removal is part of publishing content. [read post]
