Search for: "State v. Baros"
Results 1 - 20
of 190
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2014, 9:04 am
In the interview, Lady Hale also stated her view on prenuptial agreements and stuck by her decision from Radmacher v Granatino in 2010 in which she was the only judge out of the nine-judge panel to oppose enforcing the prenuptial agreement which was the subject matter of the case. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 8:53 am
Baroness Hale made clear that the question for the local authority (following on from Birmingham CC v Ali – our note here) is essentially about the future, ie the probability of the acts continuing in the future (“This is the limiting factor. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 1:58 am
Lord Kerr and Baroness Hale gave dissenting judgments. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 10:00 pm
See Nicol J’s fascinating judgment in Andrew Crosbie v Secretary of State for Defence [2011] EWHC 879 for a condensed history of this litigation and our comment on it here. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 2:40 am
Baroness Hale agreed with this. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 1:51 am
Baroness to fly. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 12:26 pm
Baroness Hale states that the phrase ‘would be reasonable for him to continue to occupy’ looks to the future as well as describing a current state. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 10:37 am
Not for the first time, Nearly Legal has drawn my attention to the case of Holmes-Moorhouse v LB Richmond upon Thames, this time as it reaches the House of Lords. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 2:15 pm
He has stated that the party is no longer hostile to same sex couples. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 2:47 am
Wider Implications The proceedings in Hook v British Airways and Stott v Thomas Cook have already attracted significant attention from the Equality and Human Rights Commission; with the Secretary of State acting as a further intervener. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 12:00 am
From December 5 to December 8, 2016, the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom heard argument in the case of Secretary of State v. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 9:31 am
From December 5 to December 8, 2016, the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom heard argument in the case of Secretary of State v. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 1:45 am
The seven claimants bringing proceedings are: Baroness Lawrence of Clarendon OBE; Elizabeth Hurley; Sir Elton John CH CBE; David Furnish; Sir Simon Hughes; Prince Harry, the Duke of Sussex; and Sadie Frost Law. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 4:34 am
Lord Sumption, referring to Lord Hoffmann’s speech in Matadeen v Pointu [1999] 1 AC 98 and that of Baroness Hale in Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza [2004] 2 AC 557, stated that the principle of equality was “not a principle special to the jurisprudence of the European Union. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:25 am
The claims were issued on 6 October 2022 by Hamlins Solicitors on behalf of six individuals: Baroness Doreen Lawrence; Prince Harry; Sir Elton John and David Furnish; Elizabeth Hurley; and Sadie Frost. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 1:24 am
Baroness Barran, the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State, Department for Education replied: “My Lords, the UK is a proud signatory of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 4:10 am
* Baroness Neville-Rolfe DBE CMG is the Baroness in question, being Parliamentary Under Secretary of State at the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills and Minister for Intellectual Property. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 6:37 am
R (S) v. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 7:37 am
The much-anticipated judgment in MacLeod v MacLeod [2008] UKPC 64 has now been delivered by the Privy Council, and the decision was not as all had expected. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 3:29 am
Updated | ZH (Tanzania) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 4 (1 February 2011) – Read judgment / press summary / our analysis The Supreme Court has unanimously ruled that in cases where a parent is threatened with deportation, the best interests of their child or children must be taken into account, particularly when the children are citizens by virtue of being born in this country. [read post]
