Search for: "State v. Baros"
Results 61 - 80
of 190
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2009, 3:01 am
(Video here)It's a 12-Justice court now staffed by 1 woman -- Lady Brenda Marjorie Hale (left), aka The Right Honorable the Baroness Hale of Richmond-- and 10 men. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 10:59 pm
Moreover, he rejected Baroness Hale’s doubts in a recent House of Lords case that consent could truly be act specific. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 4:38 am
Second, s. 167(6) which says that, subject to s. 167(1)-(5) and regulations made by the Secretary of State, “… the authority may decide on what principles the scheme is to be framed. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 2:43 pm
Note the headline assertion that British business is failing to protect innovation, then read on, says Jeremy.* Dutch Minister trumps Court of Appeal ruling, reasserts EPO immunityFollowing to the last events of the battle over the European Patent Office's governance, the Dutch Minister of Justice intervened with regard to the EPO's immunity from execution of court orders under international law, Merpel recounts.* BREAKING NEWS: CJEU says that Member States are free to determine… [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 5:32 am
The state would have been open to criticism if it did not provide her with adequate protection. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 9:34 am
The AmeriKat could not be more pleased with this response from the Scrutiny Committee – especially given that their November conclusion consisted solely of four very neutral and measured sentences stating that the proposals would continue to remain under scrutiny. [read post]
23 May 2016, 12:15 am
However, the recent Enfish v. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 3:24 am
In interviews with housing officers, she complained of her husband’s behaviour, which included shouting in front of the children, and stated that she was scared that if she confronted him he might hit her. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 4:51 pm
In R. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 8:42 am
Three decisions of the Administrative Appeals Chamber of the Upper Tribunal on HB matters stand out: SS v North East Lincolnshire Council (HB) [2011] UKUT 300 (AAC); MB v Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea (HB) [2011] UKUT 321 (AAC); MR v Bournemouth Borough Council (HB) [2011] UKUT 284 (AAC). [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 1:54 pm
In ZH (Tanzania) [2011] UKSC 4, Baroness Hale said, [33], “This means that they must be considered first. [read post]
17 Dec 2011, 8:42 am
Three decisions of the Administrative Appeals Chamber of the Upper Tribunal on HB matters stand out: SS v North East Lincolnshire Council (HB) [2011] UKUT 300 (AAC); MB v Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea (HB) [2011] UKUT 321 (AAC); MR v Bournemouth Borough Council (HB) [2011] UKUT 284 (AAC). [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 8:16 am
Although the statute did not expressly state this: 14. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 12:48 am
Lewiston LJ, highlighted that Stack was, as Baroness Hale stated, and unusual case in that the couple had gone to great lengths to keep their finances separate. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 12:48 am
Lewiston LJ, highlighted that Stack was, as Baroness Hale stated, and unusual case in that the couple had gone to great lengths to keep their finances separate. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:15 am
As mentioned above, on the same day there was a consequentials hearing in the case of Baroness Lawrence and ors v Associated Newspapers before Nicklin J. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 1:56 pm
By a 3:2 majority expressed “entirely obiter” (Brownlie II, at [45]) the Court had answered affirmatively: [48]-[55] (Baroness Hale), [56] (Lord Wilson) & [68]-[69] (Lord Clarke). [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 11:29 pm
Finally, he refers to the upcoming judgment of the Supreme Court in the appeal from the Court of Appeal’s decision in (A v. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 11:09 pm
This was a reference in particular to the infamous front page of the Daily Mail which identified the three judges who decided that the government could not trigger Article 50 (and start the Brexit clock) without the consent of Parliament (R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5 AKA Miller)Hale noted that Miller is not judge made law by any stretch of imagination. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 6:14 pm
Before we begin, an update courtesy of a reader, on the issue of Arthur hearings being held before an information is filed: Anonymous said...In Cordarius Benjamin v. [read post]
