Search for: "State v. Beatty" Results 1 - 20 of 160
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Aug 2023, 9:05 pm by Elizabeth Martinez
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit’s decision in Royal Brush Manufacturing v. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 5:50 pm by Eugene Volokh
State; the lead opinion is written by Justice Kaye Hearn and joined by Chief Justice Donald Beatty. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 8:15 am by Amy Howe
His attorneys scheduled in-person evaluations for Beatty for use in his clemency efforts and to determine whether he had a claim under Ford v. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 11:12 pm by Jonathan Pyzer
In R v Beatty (2008), the Supreme Court of Canada provided that a successful conviction of dangerous driving requires a “marked departure” from normal driving conduct. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 2:24 pm by Dani Selby
Though the anti-sodomy laws were declared unconstitutional in the 2003 Supreme Court decision, Lawrence v. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 2:13 pm
That was a reference to the opinions by Justices Pleicones and Hearn, who wanted to change the "neutral principles" rule laid down in All Saints Waccamaw to a "complete deference to the national church" rule of Watson v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 3:44 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
On this record, triable issues of fact exist as to whether, but for defendant’s failure to inform plaintiff’s principal that it could be locked into the sale agreement in perpetuity if it did not obtain municipal approval for redevelopment, it would not have entered into the contract as written and would have avoided litigation with the buyer who sued for specific performance (see Leggiadro, Ltd. v Winston & Strawn, LLP, 151 AD3d 413 [1st Dept 2017]; Escape… [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 6:34 pm
 And remember that Chief Justice Beatty, in contrast to Justices Hearn and Pleicones, agreed with Justice Toal in dissent that under South Carolina law as defined in the (2009) All Saints Waccamaw case, only an express written agreement by a parish to place its property into a trust for ECUSA's benefit could create an enforceable trust in that State. [read post]