Search for: "State v. Bender"
Results 1 - 20
of 268
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 11:55 am
Ct. 2183, 2192 (2020); United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
Leader , EDITOR-IN-CHIEF, BENDER’S LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT BULLETIN The U.S. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 6:49 pm
Bender | Medium (pointing out reasons why “training” is an imperfect metaphor that may overly anthropomorphize the software tools) [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 3:00 am
Yahoo News – Michael Bender and Anjali Huynh (New York Times) | Published: 11/29/2023 Since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 4:57 am
(Peter Mensch v Louise Mensch, NYSCEF index no. 309381/2017.) [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court will hear Harrington v. [read post]
29 Oct 2023, 6:15 pm
Co. v Campbell (538 US 408 [2003]), and Gomez v Cabatic (159 AD3d 62 [2d Dept 2018]). [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 5:00 am
In the case of Keefer v. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 7:15 am
CA - NOTEWORTHY PANEL DECISIONS Copyright 2023 by Matthew Bender & Company, Inc. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 1:18 pm
” United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 5:01 am
From Commonwealth v. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 10:19 pm
Grey v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 12:34 pm
. , William V. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 3:43 am
The plaintiffs’ “hindsight criticism of counsels’ reasonable course of action . . . does not rise to the level of legal malpractice” (Schiller v Bender, Burrows & Rosenthal, LLP, 116 AD3d at 758 [citation and internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:20 am
“The fact that the plaintiff subsequently was unhappy with the settlement [she] obtained . . . does not rise to the level of legal malpractice” (Katsoris v Bodnar & Milone, LLP, 186 AD3d at 1506 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Schiller v Bender, Burrows & Rosenthal, LLP, 116 AD3d 756, 758; Holschauer v Fisher, 5 AD3d 553, 554). [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 10:09 am
Co. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 5:58 am
In DeGregorio v Bender, 4 AD3d 384, 385 [2d Dept 2004]), Appellate Division, Second Department reversed the lower court’s denial of the defendants’ motion for summary dismissal of plaintiffs claims for legal malpractice, finding that the claim was “[b]elied by the terms of the stipulation and her approval of those terms in open court” (id.). [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 5:13 pm
” Brenman v. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 12:10 pm
Furthermore, R v Bender stated that an honest mistake on the time and date of the required attendance of the accused can negate the mens rea of the offence. [read post]
