Search for: "State v. Bender" Results 1 - 20 of 245
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2022, 8:41 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Patent Owner SynQor appeals, asking this court to vacate the Board’s decision rejecting claims 49 and 50 of the ’021 patent pursuant to United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 12:21 pm by Michael Ehline
Uber hopes to deploy flying cars as soon as 2023 in major cities in the United States. [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 5:00 am
Co. 1956), and in Pennsylvania appellate state court decisions dating back to at least 34 years ago in the case of Wolgemuth v. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 6:06 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Here, the plaintiff’s conclusory allegations were insufficient to state a cause of action alleging violation of Judiciary Law § 487 (see Klein v Rieff, 135 AD3d 910, 912 [2016]; Schiller v Bender, Burrows & Rosenthal, LLP, 116 AD3d 756, 759 [2014]). [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 3:04 am by Immigration Prof
Vermont Supreme Court Building Photo Courtesy of Wikimedia Bender's Immigration Bulletin on an important Vermont Supreme Court decision (Vermont v. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 11:33 am by Bryan Hawkins
The Ohio Supreme Court recently weighed in on these questions in State v. [read post]
1 Jan 2021, 5:24 am by Chris Seaton
Anyway, all of this culminated with the Supreme Court refusing to make this Bush v. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Citing Bender v New York City Health and Hospitals Corp., 38 NY2d 662, the Appellate Division explained that the Doctrine of Estoppel "is only applicable to a government agency when the agency acts or comports itself wrongfully or negligently, inducing reliance by a party who changes his or her position to his or her detriment or prejudice. [read post]
4 Dec 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Citing Bender v New York City Health and Hospitals Corp., 38 NY2d 662, the Appellate Division explained that the Doctrine of Estoppel "is only applicable to a government agency when the agency acts or comports itself wrongfully or negligently, inducing reliance by a party who changes his or her position to his or her detriment or prejudice. [read post]