Search for: "State v. Benfield"
Results 1 - 10
of 10
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Nov 2013, 8:10 am
Edmisten, Attorney General, 291 N.C. 361, 365, 230 S.E.2d 671, 674 (1976); Veazey, 231 N.C. at 364, 57 S.E.2d at 382-83; T & T Development Co., 125 N.C.App. at 603, 481 S.E.2d at 349; Benfield v. [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 9:25 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) St George v The Home Office [2008] EWCA Civ 1068 (08 October 2008) Symbian Ltd v Comptroller General of Patents [2008] EWCA Civ 1066 (08 October 2008) Behzadi v Behzadi [2008] EWCA Civ 1070 (08 October 2008) Orchard (Developments) Holdings Plc v Reuters Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 1017 (02 September 2008) JN (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWCA Civ 1018 (02 September 2008) HJ (Iran)… [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 10:06 am
Pioneer State Mut. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 11:11 am
On the human rights defences, the Recorder considered himself bound by R (McLellan) v Bracknell Forest Borough Council and Reigate and Banstead Borough Council v Benfield and another [2002] QB 1129, in which the Court of Appeal stated that in the context of introductory tenancies, there was simply no room to conclude that there might be any incompatibility with the Convention. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 11:11 am
On the human rights defences, the Recorder considered himself bound by R (McLellan) v Bracknell Forest Borough Council and Reigate and Banstead Borough Council v Benfield and another [2002] QB 1129, in which the Court of Appeal stated that in the context of introductory tenancies, there was simply no room to conclude that there might be any incompatibility with the Convention. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 8:10 am
State v. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 8:10 am
State v. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 7:07 am
Co. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 5:33 am
V. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 8:58 am
Compare State v. [read post]
