Search for: "State v. Benitez "
Results 61 - 80
of 97
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Aug 2011, 1:55 pm
In United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 9:50 am
Benitez v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 8:13 am
Benitez v. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 7:54 am
The case is Delgado-Ramos v. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 6:14 am
Benitez, 748 So. 2d 358 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999); Fla. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 8:35 am
Smith, and Benitez, D.J for the S.D. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 9:43 am
In the earlier case of Zadvydas v. [read post]
1 May 2010, 5:43 am
State v. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 9:08 am
Robinson v. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 12:20 pm
Benitez, United States District Judge for the Southern District of California, sitting by designation. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 11:55 pm
Benitez-Avila, __ F.3d __ (1st Cir. [read post]
16 May 2009, 4:21 am
United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 1:30 am
Michael Pena
KINGS COUNTYTorts
Bar Landlord Granted Summary Judgment; No Sufficient Evidence to Show Dram Shop Violation
Benitez v. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 11:09 pm
Supreme Court ruling in the case of Employment Division v. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 7:40 pm
Today in North Coast Women's Care Medical Group, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 6:32 pm
In their answer, the doctors who treated Benitez asserted that application of the public accommodations law to them would violate their right to free exercise of religion under the federal and state constitutions. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 10:13 pm
Which gets called out by Chief Judge Kozinski for (1) doing a bad job, and then (2) trying to get out the consequences of this (alleged) malfeasance by convincing -- successfully, I might add -- three district court judges down here (Judges Burns, Benitez, and Collins) to refuse to accept the unconditional guilty pleas of various criminal defendants.No dice, he holds. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 9:14 pm
Haviland, No. 07-3380 Grant of a conditional writ of habeas corpus is affirmed where: 1) petitioner sought to represent himself at trial, and the trial court's failure to rule on his requests to proceed pro se deprived him of his Sixth Amendment right to self-representation; and 2) state courts' objectiv [read post]