Search for: "State v. Berberich"
Results 1 - 3
of 3
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Apr 2008, 3:36 am
Contrary to the motion court's conclusion, plaintiffs cannot show that the defendants in the underlying action created the allegedly dangerous condition by an affirmative act of misfeasance (see Mercer v City of New York, 88 NY2d 955, 670 N.E.2d 443, 647 N.Y.S.2d 159 [1996]; Kelly v Berberich, 36 AD3d 475, 476-477, 828 N.Y.S.2d 332 [2007]), [**2] and the claim that said defendants failed to maintain the garage sign that was purportedly the instrumentality that… [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 6:36 am
" Berberich v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 8:05 am
Hinson, Executive Director United States Consumer Product Safety DivisionWashington, D.C. [read post]
