Search for: "State v. Betts" Results 41 - 60 of 163
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2017, 5:31 am by SAMANTHA KNIGHTS, MATRIX
The principle of a MIR per se is not objectionable as the Court states (see Konstantinov v Netherlands cited at para. 84) but the impact of the new threshold is surely a relevant consideration in considering compatibility. [read post]
30 Sep 2012, 8:33 am
This week the Maryland Court of Special Appeals issued its opinion in Buckley v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 12:01 am by John Diekman
Practice point: The New York State Human Rights Law does not immunize disabled employees from discipline or discharge for misconduct in the workplace.Student note: EEOC Guideline No. 30 specifically provides that an employer may discipline an individual with a disability for violating a workplace conduct standard which is job-related and consistent with business necessity.Case: Hazen v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
See, for example, Cook v City of Utica, 88 NY2d 833 and Bett v City of Lackawanna et al.,76 NY2d 900.The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2016/2016_00782.htm _________________ The Disability Benefits E-book: - This 810 page e-book focuses on disability leaves and benefits available to officers and employees in public service pursuant to Civil Service Law §§71, 72 and 73, General Municipal Law §207-a and… [read post]
28 Jul 2013, 4:02 pm
The Court of Appeal, in reasons for judgment released on June 27, 2013, in Chinn v. [read post]