Search for: "State v. Bias" Results 261 - 280 of 5,278
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm by INFORRM
On 4 August 2023, the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in National Council for Civil Liberties, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor [2023] EWCA Civ 926. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 10:59 am by Edward T. Kang
Rule 408 Precludes Some Settlement Evidence From Being Admitted The Federal Rule of Evidence 408 is the model for many state court rules. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 7:45 pm
Richard and Mary Eshelman Faculty Scholar; Professor of Law and International Affairs; Pennsylvania State University | 239 Lewis Katz Building, University Park, PA 16802 1.814.863.3640 (direct) || First I want to thank Marcelo Thompson, Han Zhu, and Dean Fu Hualing, and all those who organized this workshop. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 9:00 pm by Sherica Celine
Practical Guidance Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Related Content Corporations across the United States are evaluating how they manage diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) policies in the workplace in light of the recent Supreme Court decision striking down affirmative action policies on the basis of race in education, ( Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
  That pressure has only grown following the Supreme Court’s recent decision against affirmative action in SFFA v. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 10:00 pm by Merpel McKitten
As a creature of the legislative branch myself—a former copyright counsel to the US House of Representatives Committee on the Judiciary—I confess to a legislative bias where, as with copyright, the rights are statutory in origin. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 6:38 am by David Pocklington
The Court rejected the State Government’s arguments. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 3:38 pm by Daniel M. Kowalski
To remedy a non-compliant Notice to Appear, is either (1) issuing an I-261, or (2) amending the Notice to Appear, permitted by the regulations, and would either comport with the single document requirement emphasized by the United States Supreme Court in Niz-Chavez v. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 7:51 am by Dan Bressler
” “Because of the undisclosed relationship, Hashagen was deprived of the right to a fundamentally fair trial that created a potential for bias, the appeals court said. [read post]