Search for: "State v. Bias" Results 661 - 680 of 4,593
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Sep 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Rule of Necessity is a judicial doctrine that permits a judicial, quasi-judicial or administrative decision maker or body to decide a case even if he or she or it would ordinarily be disqualified due to bias or prejudice or an appearance of bias or prejudice.In this action Petitioners brought a combined CPLR Article 78 proceeding and declaratory judgment action against various state agencies and officials [Respondents], seeking, among other things, "to compel… [read post]
6 Sep 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Rule of Necessity is a judicial doctrine that permits a judicial, quasi-judicial or administrative decision maker or body to decide a case even if he or she or it would ordinarily be disqualified due to bias or prejudice or an appearance of bias or prejudice.In this action Petitioners brought a combined CPLR Article 78 proceeding and declaratory judgment action against various state agencies and officials [Respondents], seeking, among other things, "to compel… [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 6:20 pm by Jessica Monaco, ACLU
If Germany Had the Death Penalty: a Thought Experiment April 22 marks the 25th anniversary of the Supreme Court decision in McCleskey v. [read post]
1 Oct 2017, 10:46 am by Benton Martin, E.D. Mich.
By a vote of 2 to 1, the Sixth Circuit refused this week, in United States v. [read post]
25 May 2016, 2:15 pm
In fact, the Supreme Court has been condemning racial bias in jury selection in capital cases since 1880 when it outlawed the practice in Strauder v. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 5:58 am by Maxwell Kennerly
But unless you can get a class action certified — tricky, but possible, like in Dukes v. [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Canadian Association of Law Libraries
The current systemic bias against domestic violence is ultimately the acceptance of domestic violence. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 8:55 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Holder, for example, the court stated, without any further elaboration, that "we agree with the BIA that the relevant statutory provision is ambiguous. [read post]