Search for: "State v. Bias" Results 61 - 80 of 5,228
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2024, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
The most obvious class of examples, as I discussed on Monday and as I explain at greater length in the article, consists of so-called "percentage" plans by which various states guarantee admission to a state university to students graduating in a specified top percentage of their respective high school classes.For example, in his dissent in Fisher v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
Jackson Women’s Health Organization was based upon moral opposition to abortion and gender bias, instead of its stated reasoning—a draconian version of the “history and tradition” test.Dobbs v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:32 am by Nathan Dorn
There were some criticisms of his work, in particular of his manner of citation and a complaint of anti-Catholic bias in his writing. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 6:31 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Reading all the opinions here, it looks like the state of the law in the Second Circuit on Title IX discrimination is in flux. [read post]
As for nobody asking to press charges, there is a reason why criminal cases are styled as “State of Maine v. ___. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 2:03 pm by Carl Shusterman
Garland (5-24-23) Matter of Fernandes – BIA (4-2-22) Deciphering Matter of Fernandes (12-5-22) Singh v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 7:07 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
In Matter of F-P-R- , 24 I&N Dec. 681 (BIA 2008) , for example, the BIA declined to follow the Second Circuit’s decision in Joaquin-Porras v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 6:22 am by Guest Author
Sweet Home Chapter of Communities, the Court distinguished its previous decision in United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Chile Eboe-Osuji
Such solemn proceedings have the minimum value of forcing the international community to confront the problem of armed conflicts that it must confront, even if the only way left to do that is through the international judicial system established precisely to resolve international disputes, where judges must necessarily cut through the political noise and partisan bias to answer questions of law. [read post]