Search for: "State v. Bill"
Results 261 - 280
of 20,904
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2012, 2:07 pm
The Supreme recently signaled in U.S. v. [read post]
6 May 2014, 9:00 am
The bill would shield many private equity firms that own nursing homes around the state of Florida. [read post]
19 Sep 2007, 7:59 pm
SC06-2391 v. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 8:23 am
In State v. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 6:12 am
(v) An LLP shall be under obligation to maintain annual accounts reflecting true and fair view of its state of affairs. [read post]
24 May 2010, 5:56 pm
All state laws vary. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 12:21 pm
In United States v. [read post]
28 Oct 2007, 7:33 pm
/NOTICE OF FILINGCOMES NOW the State of Florida, and files the following:1.Berry v. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 1:59 am
Media lawyers will be particularly interested in the way in which the Bill deals with the obligations placed on Member States by Article 85 of the GDPR. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 1:59 am
Media lawyers will be particularly interested in the way in which the Bill deals with the obligations placed on Member States by Article 85 of the GDPR. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 1:59 am
Media lawyers will be particularly interested in the way in which the Bill deals with the obligations placed on Member States by Article 85 of the GDPR. [read post]
17 May 2010, 10:09 pm
The United States Supreme Court ruled in United States v. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 7:42 pm
Supreme Court case Riley v. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 11:00 am
Specifically, the Court detaches RFRA from cases like United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 6:21 am
An attorney can recover fees on an account stated "with proof that a bill . . . was issued to a client and held by the client without objection for an unreasonable period of time" (O'Connell & Aronowitz v Gullo, 229 AD2d 637, 638 [1996], lv denied 89 NY2d 803 [1996]). [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 4:10 am
They argued that this was the necessary implication of the finding of the Supreme Court in the case of Munir v Secretary of State [2012] 1 WLR 2192 and Alvi (which were heard together) that the power of the Secretary of State to make or vary the Immigration Rules was wholly statutory and not an exercise of prerogative power: [27]. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 7:04 am
Bills not taken up may be telling Other bills related to judicial elections and other efforts to alter the state’s judiciary were not taken up. [read post]
29 May 2010, 9:17 am
State barred from initiating or enacting legislation authorizing the furloughing of State workersDonohue et al v Paterson, USDC, Northern District of New York, 1:10-CV-00543 (LEK/DRH) [Filed May 28,2010]Federal District Court Judge Lawrence E. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 9:47 am
Introduced by Assemblyman Phil Steck on January 15, 2015 and by State Senator Andrew Lanza on March 20, 2015, the bill (A2147/S4447) is entitled “Policy Against Restraint of Trade,” and operates from the premise that the Court of Appeals decision in BDO Seidman v. [read post]
13 Dec 2020, 10:34 am
See Arizona v. [read post]
