Search for: "State v. Bird Head" Results 21 - 40 of 182
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2019, 11:12 am
Here is some of the latest:New Year mews from the Eastern District of Texas in HTC v Ericsson: Long-time Kat friend, Richard Vary (Bird & Bird) reports on FRAND news from Texas:"In the phone wars, the smallest saleable patent practising unit (SSPPU) argument is a particularly controversial one. [read post]
21 Feb 2006, 8:03 am
I used to give this long winded, jargon filled response that would typically make a lawyer look at me the same a dog does when you've said something they don't understand - head tilted sideways with one eyebrow lifted. [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 7:31 am
And to judge by a number of my family members, who roll their eyes and head for their iPods when I bring up these subjects, they are probably happier for it! [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 12:42 pm
 However, the parties will have to await the decision in the Actavis v Sanofi reference before they can see what the future of their case looks like. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 1:05 pm
Here's the quote from United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 2:28 pm by David Super
  Congress probably could not condition Medicaid funding on a state changing its state bird. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 12:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
The California Gull has since been adopted as Utah’s official state bird. [read post]
23 May 2012, 12:00 pm by Matthew Parham
Bird Head, 331 N.W.2d 785 (Neb. 1983) (child's "best interest" provided "good cause" to deviate); Adoption of M., 832 P.2d 518 (Wash. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 12:59 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
The plate features a drawing of the head of an eagle (or other bird of prey) and the words "Respects Wildlife. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 1:30 pm
  It is too late, however, to correct this injustice.United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 8:19 am
.' 'You hear the flock of birds flying overhead? [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 4:26 am
Appeal dismissed.S v S [2014] EWCA Civ 95 is one of those rare birds these days: a split decision from the Court of Appeal.The facts were stated by Lord Justice Moore-Bick:"The claim had come on for hearing before Sir Hugh [Bennett] in Liverpool on 9th July 2012. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 8:52 am by WIMS
<> Black Warrior Riverkeeper, Inc. v. [read post]