Search for: "State v. Birmingham"
Results 1 - 20
of 779
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2019, 2:00 am
In Shuttlesworth v City of Birmingham, 394 U.S. 147 (1969), the U.S. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 4:03 am
Ali and another v Birmingham City Council (Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government intervening) [2010] UKSC 8; [2010] WLR (D) 86 “A local housing authority’s duty, under section 193 of the Housing Act 1996, to secure that accommodation be made available for an unintentionally homeless person who had a priority need did not give the homeless person a ‘civil right’ within the meaning of art 6(1) of the European Convention for the… [read post]
13 Aug 2008, 8:35 am
Doherty v Birmingham City Council (Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government intervening) [2008] UKHL 57; [2008] WLR (D) 291 “The definition of ‘protected site’ in s 5(1) of the Mobile Homes Act 1983, in excluding gipsies from the protection of the Act, was incompatible with an occupier's right under art 8 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms to respect for his home. [read post]
12 Jun 2007, 1:57 am
Housing authority need not state the obvious that the offer is final Omar v. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 3:01 am
Salford City Council v Mullen: Hounslow London Borough Council v Hall; Leeds City Council v Hall; Birmingham City Council v Frisby; Manchester City Council v Mushin (Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government intervening) [2010] EWCA Civ 336; [2010] WLR (D) 91 ”Guidance for county courts hearing applications for possession orders by local authority landlords of non-secure tenancies where the occupier, being an… [read post]
7 May 2010, 2:40 am
Regina (Clue) v Birmingham City Council and Others Court of Appeal “A local authority was not entitled to decide how the Secretary of State for the Home Department might dispose of an application for leave to remain in the United Kingdom. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 8:18 am
The recent decision in Birmingham City Council v Forde [2009] EWHC 12 (QB) is a worrying one both for Defendants and for the legal profession generally. [read post]
16 May 2013, 5:00 pm
Namely, bingo games and operations have been granted legitimacy throughout the state – provided they meet a strict criteria of of six guidelines, per the 2009 Alabama Supreme Court decision in Barber v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 2:00 am
Jonathan Grossberg (Thomson Reuters), Kerry Inger (Auburn; Google Scholar) & Carneil Wilson (Dentons Sirote, Birmingham, AL), Moore v. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 5:00 pm
Supreme Court ruling of Atkins v. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 7:02 am
In Walker v. [read post]
20 May 2021, 2:30 am
Birmingham argued that M v Newham had been wrongly decided, and that the duty was only to secure accommodation within a reasonable period of time. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 5:00 pm
Of course, no defendant is required to testify because the state has the burden to prove the charges beyond a reasonable doubt. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 9:20 am
Graffeo determined that the Memorial Preservation Act was unconstitutional in his resolution of Alabama v. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 9:48 am
A recent study by the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) ranks Birmingham in the top 10 most violent cities in the United States. [read post]
6 Sep 2014, 8:04 am
In Guilmette v. [read post]
17 May 2013, 9:25 am
Namely, bingo games and operations have been granted legitimacy throughout the state - provided they meet a strict criteria of of six guidelines, per the 2009 Alabama Supreme Court decision in Barber v. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 5:00 pm
In Guilmette v. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 1:28 pm
Alabama law allows the state to increase penalties for certain types of drugs like cocaine and heroin compared to, for instance, marijuana.Additional Resources: Man charged after being caught with meth components at Homewood hotel, by Carol Robinson, The Birmingham News [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 9:55 pm
So, Doherty (FC) (Appellant) and others v Birmingham City Council (Respondent) [2008] UK HL 57 Well, well, and once more for effect, well. [read post]
