Search for: "State v. Birnbaum " Results 1 - 20 of 55
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Oct 2014, 6:57 am by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
Today, the United States Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Warger v. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 7:08 pm by Ilya Somin
Under the New Jersey state constitution (as in nearly all other states) the state can only take property for a “public use,” and only if it is authorized by the legislature. [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 4:28 am
”**** * see Matter of Sheeran v New York State Dept. of Transp., 68 AD3d 1199 and Matter of Birnbaum v New York State Dept. of Labor, 75 AD3d 707 ** DOT and DOL both claimed that 4 NYCRR 21.3 and Article 30 of the relevant collective bargaining agreements between the union and the employers in support of their decisions. *** CSL §73 permits a public employer to terminate an employee who has been continuously absent from work for… [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 5:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Ultimately Supreme Court directed that State Farm Insurance Company [State Farm], with which the Birnbaums had automobile and umbrella insurance policies, be joined.The Appellate Division said that the County, in support of motion, had submitted the consultant agreement. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 2:39 pm by Ron Coleman
That individual is appellant-defendant David Guggenheim Birnbaum, who respectfully submits that, in light of all the circumstances, the answer to the above question cannot possibly be in the affirmative. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 8:45 pm by Ron Coleman
That individual is appellant-defendant David Guggenheim Birnbaum, who respectfully submits that, in light of all the circumstances, the answer to the above question cannot possibly be in the affirmative. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 11:01 am by Sean Wajert
The American Chemistry Council has noted that updating the legislation in certain respects made good sense, favoring a comprehensive approach, rather than the current patchwork of state and federal laws governing chemicals. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 5:29 am by Staci Zaretsky
* What will happen if SCOTUS were to overturn Roe v. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
As the Court of Appeals held in Matter of Sheeran v New York State Dept. of Transp., 18 NY3d 61 [Decided with Birnbaum v NYS Department of Labor], the procedural safeguards set out in Civil Service Law §72.1 are available to an employee if employer bars his or her return to work from sick leave. [read post]
17 May 2014, 4:37 pm
The Supreme Court’s 2005 decision in Kelo v. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 8:42 pm by Richard Montes
– whether plaintiff’s defamation action brought based on comments posted on an internet website were barred by the Federal Communications Decency Act of 1996 (CDA) Matter of Birnbaum v. [read post]