Search for: "State v. Bishop" Results 341 - 360 of 963
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2018, 10:35 am
This holding is based on the National Church's recognition of Charles vonRosenberg as its Bishop and the express trust imposed on Respondents' property by the Dennis Canon, as well as on state corporate law principles. [read post]
6 May 2024, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
(Forthcoming)).Abubakar Yusuf Mamud, Ummah: a Holistic Framework for Preventing and Countering Violent Extremism in Nigeria, (March 16, 2024).Neil James Foster, Liability of a Bishop for Sexual Abuse Committed by Clergy: Bird v DP (A Pseudonym). [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 9:19 pm
Barcelo III, Substantive and Procedural Arbitrability in Ad Hoc Investor-State Arbitration — BG Group v. [read post]
3 Aug 2017, 12:13 pm
That convention elected Charles G. vonRosenberg as Provisional Bishop of ECSC, who promptly brought suit against Bishop Lawrence in federal court and countersued in the State court action -- eventually seeking the recovery of all the properties of each of the 36 separate parishes involved in that litigation. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 7:54 am by Amy Howe
”  Looking ahead to Friday’s Conference at Mayer Brown’s Class Defense blog, Timothy Bishop and Joshua Yount argue that two of the class-certification cases on the Conference,  Whirlpool Corp. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 6:39 pm
Many other Bishops may not be aware of it just now, but they are going to face plenty of storms in their own dioceses after they return.This is not like General Convention 2003, when people had to read the news about the confirmation of V. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 9:30 pm by Mitra Sharafi
Islam v Secretary of State for the Home Department, R v Immigration Appeal Tribunal and Another, ex parte Shah (1999) Nora Honkala72. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 7:02 am
The author was involved in a seminal State Supreme Court case on the topic, Foley-Ciccantelli v. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
The Bishops Conference stated that “the degrading and distortion of religious symbols by purposely changing their meaning is contrary to public morals, especially when it is done in pursuit of commercial gain”. [read post]