Search for: "State v. Bishop"
Results 361 - 380
of 840
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Dec 2015, 8:08 am
After meeting with the then-president of the United States Conference of Catholic bishops (Archbishop Timothy Dolan of New York), President Barack Obama and HHS announced an accommodation to the bishops’ objection. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 2:45 pm
Only eighteen months ago, the Supreme Court in Burwell v. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
The Board here was correct in finding broadcast-incidental copying engages the reproduction right, consistent with Bishop v. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 3:07 pm
Zubik is a Roman Catholic bishop in Pittsburgh, Pa., and he is joined by the bishop in Erie, Pa., their dioceses, and various non-profit institutions in those two cities. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 4:15 am
In Anglican Development Fund Diocese of Bathurst v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 12:56 pm
In today’s case (Litt v. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 5:04 am
United States comes from Mark Joseph Stern at Slate and Danielle Blevins of Talk Radio News Service. [read post]
8 Nov 2015, 1:49 pm
Zubik is the twelfth Bishop of the Roman Catholic Diocese of Pittsburgh, named to that post by Pope Benedict XVI in 2007. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 11:15 am
Himmelreich); a challenge to a requirement that an American convicted of sex crimes must update his registration as an offender in a U.S. state after he has moved abroad (Nichols v. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 12:21 pm
Trade Minister Andrew Robb announced that Australia would take no part in the U.S. patrols, although Foreign Minister Julie Bishop later said that Australia is “on the same page” with the United States regarding the South China Sea. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 3:34 am
U.S. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 4:00 am
In Trustees of the Alpine Methodist Episcopal Church v. [read post]
23 Sep 2015, 11:17 am
The statute at issue in the case, State v. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 4:00 am
On August 31, the University filed a 50-page request for review of the Regional Director's latest decision (full text), arguing not just that the Pacific Lutheran test was misapplied, but arguing also:The new test under PLU contravenes the United States Supreme Court’s holding in National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 9:01 pm
Hogan (invalidating same-sex admissions policy), considered her vote in United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2015, 7:30 am
See Bishop v. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 7:05 am
Conference of Catholic Bishops. [read post]
18 Jul 2015, 8:03 pm
Braiman, 44 NY2d 584, 590-591, 407 N.Y.S.2d 449; Matter of Bishop v. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 8:05 am
In today’s case (Hendry v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 4:05 am
In Means v. [read post]
