Search for: "State v. Bishop" Results 21 - 40 of 951
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Dec 2023, 4:54 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
State-court decisions enjoining contested votes include the following: Max v ALP, Inc., 206 AD3d 495 [1st Dept 2022] [“Order . . . which granted defendants’ motion for a preliminary injunction to the extent of enjoining . . . from commencing a shareholders’ meeting for the purpose of restoring plaintiff as President and CEO of defendant ALP, Inc.. . . unanimously affirmed”]; and ANO, Inc. v Goldberg, 167 AD3d 731 [2d Dept 2018] [“Yimini… [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 4:59 am by Frank Cranmer
” The response to a follow-up question on 8 December from the Bishop of Worcester was inconsequential. [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 10:40 am by Amy Howe
ShareThe Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on Monday in one of the highest-profile bankruptcies in recent memory: Harrington v. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 12:33 am by Frank Cranmer
Without a doubt, he states, the canons provide for how a bishop is appointed and for how disputes relating to the election of bishops are resolved: “Courts cannot appoint a bishop for the Church. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 2:37 am by David Pocklington
The biggest legal news of the week was almost certainly the judgment of the Supreme Court in R (AAA (Syria) & Ors) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] UKSC 42, in which the Court held unanimously that the Secretary of State’s policy of sending asylum-seekers to Rwanda was unlawful. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 1:07 am by Frank Cranmer
The biggest legal news of the week was almost certainly the judgment of the Supreme Court in R (AAA (Syria) & Ors) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] UKSC 42, in which the Court held unanimously that the Secretary of State’s policy of sending asylum-seekers to Rwanda was unlawful. [read post]
12 Nov 2023, 6:17 am by Frank Cranmer
Ignatius Yordan Nugraha, Strasbourg Observers: Consolidating the legal recognition and protection of same-sex couples: Koilova and Babulkova v Bulgaria. [read post]
7 Oct 2023, 11:58 pm by Frank Cranmer
And finally… “Congratulations to Ian Bishop who was consecrated as Bishop of Thetford yesterday,” said The Times Diary, “becoming the third Bishop Bishop after William Bishop in 1623 and Jim Bishop in 1962 (see also Judge Judge, former Lord Chief Justice). [read post]
23 Sep 2023, 8:20 am by Frank Cranmer
The debate had an international rather than a domestic focus and was replied to by the Minister of State at the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office, Anne-Marie Trevelyan. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 8:15 am by Tristan Marot
Russel v Russel stated that situations in which discretion against arbitration should be exercised are ‘few and exceptional. [read post]
12 Aug 2023, 11:41 pm by Frank Cranmer
Athwal v State of Queensland [2023] QCA 156 considered the constitutionality of the prohibition under Queensland’s Weapons Act 1990 on bringing a kirpan into a school. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 10:00 pm by Merpel McKitten
It’s not for nothing that Lord Acton’s comment in his 1887 letter to Bishop Creighton was ‘Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely’. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 1:24 am by Frank Cranmer
Forthcoming lecture on Aston Cantlow v Wallbank Aston Law School has organised a lecture by Mark Hill KC to be given at the parish church of St John the Baptist, Aston Cantlow, on Monday, 4 September, on Aston Cantlow v Wallbank [2003] UKHL 37, the leading case on chancel repair liability. [read post]