Search for: "State v. Bishop" Results 401 - 420 of 960
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2007, 1:16 pm
Texas, which declared the state's anti-sodomy law unconstitutional. [read post]
16 Nov 2017, 4:25 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Plaintiff’s equivocal denial of knowledge of the terms of the settlement is flatly contradicted by the clear terms of the settlement agreement (see Bishop v Maurer, 33 AD3d 497, 499 [1st Dept 2006], affd 9 NY3d 910 [2007]). [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 8:37 am by Doug Cornelius
Supreme Court’s definition of an “investment contract” in SEC v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 11:33 am
But if a new diocese is formed out of an unorganized area, Article V itself spells out the procedure that is followed: "The proceedings shall originate in a Convocation of the Clergy and Laity of the unorganized area called by the Bishop for that purpose . . . [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
The spotlight stays on the high-profile union-fees case that will be argued this month, Janus v. [read post]
11 Jul 2016, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
Samar, Toward a New Separation of Church and State: Implications for Analogies to the Supreme Court Decision in Hobby Lobby by the Decision in Obergefell v. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 7:03 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
utm_term=.e26cdbdc081bOf interest to patent people, Taney was in the dissenting four in Winans v. [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 9:57 pm
That, in the judgment of this Council, it is perfectly consistent with the good faith which she owes to the Bishops and Dioceses with which she has been in union since 1862, for any Diocese to decide for herself whether she shall any longer continue in union with this Council;. . .V. [read post]