Search for: "State v. Bishop" Results 101 - 120 of 956
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2012, 7:50 am by boston
“To insist that the government respect the separation of church and state is not to discriminate against religion; indeed, it promotes a respect for religion by refusing to single out any creed for official favor at the expense of all others,” observed Stearns in the American Civil Liberties Union of Massachusetts v. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 10:02 am
Not only that, but it refused to acknowledge the ruling by the South Carolina Supreme Court in 2009 in All Saints Waccamaw Parish v. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 11:47 am
  It definitely at least looks like the Secretary of State isn't totally on top of things. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 4:10 am by Howard Friedman
Bishop, a case in which the 10th Circuit held that Oklahoma's ban on granting licences for same-sex marriages performed in the state is unconstitutional. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 11:25 pm
In its table of cases cited, it lists the landmark decision of the United States Supreme Court in Jones v. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 2:36 pm
But while a "diocese" may thus be seen as continuous in the eyes of the Episcopal Church, that entity, as well as the entity that departed the Church, are each still governed by, and subject to, the "First Amendment rights of individuals and corporations (see Citizens United v. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 1:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Supreme Court has stated that the sufficiency of a claim of entitlement must be made by reference to appropriate State or local laws", citing Bishop v Wood, 426 US 341. [read post]
8 Sep 2022, 1:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Supreme Court has stated that the sufficiency of a claim of entitlement must be made by reference to appropriate State or local laws", citing Bishop v Wood, 426 US 341. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 4:48 pm
decision by the Supreme Court of Texas in Episcopal Diocese of Fort Worth v. [read post]
14 Mar 2013, 8:45 am
But bishops who testify outside their dioceses in support of the party line -- such as the Presiding Bishop herself, who signed an amicus brief in the Dixon v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 4:46 pm
They were acting under the guidance of the Presiding Bishop's hired attorney (and former Chancellor of the Diocese whose identity they were misappropriating), Mr. [read post]