Search for: "State v. Blackwell" Results 61 - 80 of 182
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2016, 2:54 pm
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
[Ken Womble, Fault Lines on Long Island case of People v. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 3:29 am by Peter Mahler
Blackwell [626 A2d 366] which seemingly squelched any common-law basis for shareholder oppression claims. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 7:02 am
Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2008 (Brandywine Press, 2000). [read post]
10 Aug 2014, 12:30 am by Emily Prifogle
"Also on H-Net is a review of The State Trial of Doctor Henry Sacheverell (Wiley-Blackwell) by Brian Cowan, and a review of Noriko Aso's Public Properties: Museums in Imperial Japan (Duke University Press).Gavin Wright's Sharing the Prize: The Economics of the Civil Rights Revolution in the American South (Belknap Press) is reviewed on HNN. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 3:46 am by Kevin LaCroix
This question has been particularly important in Georgia, where there were more bank failures than any in other state and consequently more failed bank litigation. [read post]
20 May 2014, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
Federal Judge Strikes Down Pennsylvania Same-Sex Marriage Ban – Harrisburg lawyer Lee Tankle of McNees Wallace & Nurick on the firm’s Pennsylvania Labor & Employment Blog Oklahoma Joins the Patent Troll Hunt – Jacob Martinez and Tod Melgar of Chadbourne & Parke on the firm’s blog, TMT Perspectives Cybersecurity Securities Class Actions are Coming: Predictions, Analysis, and Practical Guidance – Seattle attorney Douglas Greene of Lane Powell on the… [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 7:37 pm by Ezra Rosser
Sanchez & Marc Brenman Commentaries by Guillermo Mayer, Angela Glover Blackwell, Eugene B. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 3:35 am by Peter Mahler
In its 1993 ruling in Nixon v Blackwell, the Delaware Supreme Court broadly rejected the notion that “there should be any special, judicially-created rules to ‘protect’ minority stockholders of closely-held Delaware corporations” (626 A.2d 1366, 1379). [read post]