Search for: "State v. Blake" Results 221 - 240 of 680
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Sep 2007, 12:27 pm
§ 2255 asserting that a federal sentence must be corrected due to error under United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 6:24 pm
As noted in this prior post, a Sixth Circuit panel earlier this month indicated that all three members would "strongly recommend" en banc review of the "important question" of "whether the continuing use of acquitted conduct as a sentencing enhancement violates United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 6:07 am
Charlton conciselytold the committee that in United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2006, 3:06 am
  To sample two of Judge Rosenblatt's decisions in which he infused his dogged pursuit of historical background information, see two of my favorites:  Blake v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 5:42 pm by Larry Catá Backer
On the one hand, the entire purpose of the system is to protect society as a collective from the aberrant behavior of certain individuals: a criminal case is always the State v. or the People v. the individual defendant.  [read post]
15 Oct 2007, 8:39 am
Read the Comments too.Excerpt from the blog post:"Providing a great reminder that there are still many unsettled Blakely issues, the Oregon Supreme Court today in State v. [read post]
24 Nov 2008, 3:34 pm
" With all due respect, Professor Sunstein, I blogged through a Sixth Amendment revolution with Blakely;  I knew Blakely was revolutionary because lower courts started striking down all sorts of federal and state laws based on Blakely; this constitutional sentencing revolution had been  a friend of mine. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 9:21 am
Minnesota (06-8273): "Are state supreme courts required to use the standard announced in Teague v. [read post]
6 May 2016, 2:36 pm
Espinosa turned over his check to the Dept. of State on Thursday, in the amount of $5,843.00. [read post]