Search for: "State v. Blake"
Results 281 - 300
of 976
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2017, 9:30 am
"The federal court's March 31 decision in the case of U.S. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2006, 8:34 am
In United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 10:04 am
State v. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 6:07 am
Charlton conciselytold the committee that in United States v. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 6:24 pm
As noted in this prior post, a Sixth Circuit panel earlier this month indicated that all three members would "strongly recommend" en banc review of the "important question" of "whether the continuing use of acquitted conduct as a sentencing enhancement violates United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2007, 10:49 am
State, 716 N.E.2d 919, 933 (Ind. 1999); Angleton v. [read post]
31 Dec 2006, 9:15 pm
Booker and Blakely v. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 7:30 am
State v. [read post]
4 May 2016, 5:52 am
Blake v. [read post]
20 Nov 2006, 3:06 am
To sample two of Judge Rosenblatt's decisions in which he infused his dogged pursuit of historical background information, see two of my favorites: Blake v. [read post]
15 Oct 2007, 8:39 am
Read the Comments too.Excerpt from the blog post:"Providing a great reminder that there are still many unsettled Blakely issues, the Oregon Supreme Court today in State v. [read post]
24 Nov 2008, 3:34 pm
" With all due respect, Professor Sunstein, I blogged through a Sixth Amendment revolution with Blakely; I knew Blakely was revolutionary because lower courts started striking down all sorts of federal and state laws based on Blakely; this constitutional sentencing revolution had been a friend of mine. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 4:59 am
New Jersey (2000) and Blakely v. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 2:47 am
U.S. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 9:04 pm
On April 1, Rothert and Blake again told federal Judge Fernando J. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 3:45 am
Three years ago, in State v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 6:34 pm
But, another two years after that, in Blakely v. [read post]
21 Mar 2007, 9:21 am
Minnesota (06-8273): "Are state supreme courts required to use the standard announced in Teague v. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 4:22 pm
Since Mrs Justice Collins Rice handed down judgment in Fox v Blake [2024] EWHC 146 (KB) there has been a lot of online discussion about the case. [read post]
14 Apr 2007, 7:48 am
United States v. [read post]
