Search for: "State v. Blake"
Results 301 - 320
of 976
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2021, 1:45 pm
From the majority opinion in State v. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 4:00 am
From SSRN:Nelson Tebbe & Micah Schwartzman, The Politics of Proportionality, (120 Michigan Law Review 1307 (2022)).Guy Baldwin, The Coronavirus Pandemic and Religious Freedom: Judicial Decisions in the United States and United Kingdom, ((2022) Judicial Review).Christopher Mills, Blake Davis & Richard Osborne, Is Viability Dicta? [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 4:41 pm
His Lordship stated at p. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 12:09 pm
Blake’s records, which explicitly stated Sutton had “spondylosis without myelopathy,” suggesting that this contradicted Sutton’s claim of having myelopathy. [read post]
1 May 2009, 3:45 am
Back in 2006, in State v. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 7:30 am
The style of this Federal case is, David Lewis Builders, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 11:42 am
V. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 2:49 am
MS (Pakistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 21 November 2019. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 5:17 am
Even though his situation was “unfortunate”, reliance placed in Basnet [2012] UKUT 113 (IAC) was rejected because Blake J’s remarks in that case are not constitutive of “a universal rule”. [read post]
6 May 2016, 2:36 pm
Espinosa turned over his check to the Dept. of State on Thursday, in the amount of $5,843.00. [read post]
19 Feb 2007, 5:54 am
In State v. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 10:10 am
As Lyle Denniston notes, now the earliest-argued case still undecided is "James v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 1:09 pm
In Public Agency Compensation Trust v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 6:27 am
Among them are Curtis Publishing Co. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2008, 5:47 am
Blake Constr. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 9:22 am
I therefore cannot agree with the majority that Blakely can be disregarded and must respectfully dissent.In Justin James v. [read post]
7 Nov 2006, 8:20 am
The Court will consider the retroactive application of Blakely v. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 4:33 pm
Blake Gopnik recently summarized his position for Marketplace. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 6:16 pm
Banegas CA2/2 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 12:46 pm
Finally, Doug Berman has this post at Sentencing Law & Policy about how Bockting might apply to Apprendi or Blakely. [read post]
