Search for: "State v. Board of Medical Examiners"
Results 21 - 40
of 978
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2011, 11:04 am
Under the terms of a stipulation in a previous disciplinary proceeding conducted by the Wisconsin Medical Examining Board (MEB), Wetzler submitted to an evaluation of his professional competency by the Physician Assessment Service [...] [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 11:13 am
Cernak, Schiff Hardin LLP Reprinted with permission Post originally appeared on the AntitrustConnect Blog On October 14, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
5 May 2007, 8:51 pm
" Delay in Board Investigation: The relevant section, 14-404(j)(2), states "If the Board is unable to complete the disposition of a complaint within 1 year, the Board shall include in the record of that complaint a detailed explanation of the reason for the delay. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 8:50 am
As featured in #WorkforceWednesday: This week, we examine the enforcement risks employers could face in the complex, state-by-state landscape of abortion law after Roe v. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 5:30 am
" Citing Matter of Meyer v Board of Trustees of N.Y. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 5:30 am
" Citing Matter of Meyer v Board of Trustees of N.Y. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 1:17 am
Requirements Imposed By State Licensing Boards and Medical Professional Societies The involvement of medical professionals in disciplining physicians for dubious litigation testimony, whether through state licensing authorities or voluntary medical associations, raises some difficult questions: Does a physician’s rendering an opinion on a medical issue in litigation, such as diagnosing silicosis, asbestosis, welding-induced… [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 2:01 pm
The insurer argued that a previous holding of the Reviewing Board in Estey v. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 7:43 am
The board stated that the examining physician must determine whether an employee has a disability, and if so to what extent, and whether the disability arose out of employment. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 10:39 am
Chudik v. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 4:20 am
Not all “serious medical conditions” are protected by a constitutional right to privacyMatson v. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 7:50 pm
See Jenks v. [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 1:48 am
Highlights from the new EPO guidelines for examination 2021: ViCo oral proceedings, description amendments and antibodies (14 Feb 2021)Illumina v MGI Part 2: Has the UK lost its way on the doctrine of equivalents? [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 9:04 am
The employee was also examined by an independent medical examiner pursuant to § 11A. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 4:00 am
Pursuant to Education Law §913, the appointing authority referred Petitioner to a psychiatrist for a medical examination to determine his mental capacity to continue working as a custodian and directed Petitioner to provide the psychiatrist with "any and all medical records relating to [his] current state of health. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 10:15 am
Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
28 May 2012, 6:00 am
Olunga v. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 6:14 am
Facts: This case (Swan v. [read post]
27 Aug 2006, 6:20 am
Knechtel v. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 7:39 pm
Supreme Court on behalf of We All Help Patients, Inc. in North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
