Search for: "State v. Board of Medical Examiners"
Results 61 - 80
of 977
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2009, 8:58 am
In Giant Eagle v. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:50 pm
On June 22, 2023, the Appeals Board issued an en banc decision in Nunes v. [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 3:40 am
Caymus Vineyards v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 2:30 am
The same hospital is required by section 805(b) to report certain disciplinary actions to the Medical Board. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 2:30 am
The same hospital is required by section 805(b) to report certain disciplinary actions to the Medical Board. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 9:52 am
On Monday, we saw the contours of state-action immunity from federal antitrust law, and on Tuesday, we saw the basic facts of the North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 9:30 pm
Earlier this year, the Supreme Court held in North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 8:17 am
See Vitronics Corp. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 5:08 am
Upon the completion of such examination the medical board shall report and certify to the board whether such beneficiary is or is not totally or partially incapacitated physically or mentally and whether he or she is or is not engaged in or able to engage in a gainful occupation. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 9:36 am
In Frances Margraf v. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 3:26 am
The Board observed that in United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
" Citing Matter of Corina-Chernosky v Dormitory Auth. of State of N.Y., 157 AD3d 1067, the Appellate Division said that "To be entitled to workers' compensation benefits for an occupational disease, a claimant must establish a recognizable link between his or her condition and a distinctive feature of his or her occupation through the submission of competent medical evidence". [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
" Citing Matter of Corina-Chernosky v Dormitory Auth. of State of N.Y., 157 AD3d 1067, the Appellate Division said that "To be entitled to workers' compensation benefits for an occupational disease, a claimant must establish a recognizable link between his or her condition and a distinctive feature of his or her occupation through the submission of competent medical evidence". [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 12:28 pm
Traditionally, regulation of the medical profession has been the province of the States and state medical boards. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 10:56 am
The Court disagreed, and stated that the defense was asking for an overly strict reading of the statute. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 10:42 am
In Steffey v. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 8:14 am
Maine's primary medical expert when it comes to medical examinations in sexual abuse cases is Dr. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 1:10 pm
There is usually 'no better evidence of the state of one’s health” than the medical opinions from the patient’s current treating doctor.' (Gunn v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 11:48 pm
North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 9:30 pm
The agency currently at issue is the North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners, which is authorized by state statute to regulate the dental profession in North Carolina. [read post]
