Search for: "State v. Bogus" Results 1 - 20 of 855
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2007, 9:00 am
This is no surprise to Point of Law readers (Jan. 10; Jan. 13; May 24), but it does mean that three bogus consumer-fraud class actions over light cigarettes return to state... [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 10:00 am by Eric Goldman
Canning * 17 USC 512(f) Preempts State Law Claims Over Bogus Copyright Takedown Notices–Amaretto v. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 6:31 am
Although bogus account statements generated to lull defrauded investors are not in and of themselves sufficient to establish a securities fraud violation, because they are not statements made "in connection with the purchase or sale of any security," they are relevant evidence of the defendant's intent to defraud and the extent of the scheme employed, the Second Circuit held yesterday in a short decision in United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 1:07 pm
From the amicus brief of the Committee of Concerned Social Scientists, State (New Jersey) v. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 1:15 pm by Gene Quinn
The EFF does not like the Revised Patent Eligibility Guidance published by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) in January 2019 and is charging USPTO Director Andrei Iancu with attempting to subvert the United States Supreme Court and essentially ignore Alice v. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 9:07 am by Eric Goldman
Viacom * 17 USC 512(f) Preempts State Law Claims Over Bogus Copyright Takedown Notices–Amaretto v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 11:43 am by Eric
The state law claims were dismissed without prejudice to refiling in state court. [read post]
24 Aug 2008, 11:55 am
Church leaders believe that, despite warnings, many priests are being duped into performing marriages of convenience.Meanwhile the issue was complicated last month when the House of Lords issued a decision in R (on the application of Baiai and others) v. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 4:11 am
A classic case of a bogus inventory as a general search without impoundment is State v. [read post]