Search for: "State v. Borough"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,110
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2025, 10:43 am
MV, R (On the Application Of) v London Borough of Lewisham (2025) EWHC 280 (Admin) A curious judicial review claim by Mr MV in person. [read post]
2 Feb 2025, 9:07 am
Hussaini v Islington London Borough Council (2025) EWCA Civ 22 Mr Hussaini was a refugee. [read post]
26 Jan 2025, 10:12 am
A council is not entitled “to investigate the accuracy of the alleged new facts before deciding whether to treat the application as valid, even where there may be reason to suspect the accuracy of the allegations” (Neuberger LJ in Rikha Begum v Tower Hamlets London Borough Council (2005) EWCA Civ 340. [read post]
30 Dec 2024, 9:17 am
London Borough of Hackney v Weintraub (2024) EWCA Civ 1561 We saw this case on the conditions for the right to buy in the High Court. [read post]
17 Nov 2024, 3:53 am
Davis v. [read post]
5 Nov 2024, 2:43 pm
Missouri State of Missouri, et al., v. [read post]
24 Oct 2024, 10:59 am
Facts – Hajan v Brent The Claimant (Respondent) was Brent Borough Council, who granted the Defendant (Appellant) Mr Hajan a secure tenancy in 2010. [read post]
13 Oct 2024, 1:03 pm
Enfield have not fallen foul of the principles enunciated by Lord Dyson in R(Lumba) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (2012) 1 AC 245. [read post]
27 Sep 2024, 5:59 am
According to a report compiled by an advocacy group, Pregnancy Justice, in the year after Roe v. [read post]
11 Sep 2024, 9:37 am
The case is Stringer v. [read post]
11 Aug 2024, 11:29 am
ZRR, R (On the Application Of) v London Borough of Bexley (2024) EWHC 2073 (Admin) This was a judicial review of Bexley’s contention that temporary accommodation offered to ZRR under s.190 Housing Act 1996 was suitable and its duty was discharged when ZRR refused that accommodation. [read post]
4 Aug 2024, 10:40 am
UO v London Borough of Redbridge (2024) EWHC 1989 (Admin) We first saw UO and Redbridge in this judicial review of an unlawful housing needs assessment (HNA) and suitability decision. [read post]
21 Jul 2024, 4:52 pm
” On 2 July 2024, some arrived with placards stating: “Jurors have an absolute right to acquit a defendant according to their conscience. [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 3:04 am
On ‘maintenance’, the Upper Tribunal considered Assethold Limited v Watts (2014) UKUT 537, Welsh v London Borough of Greenwich (2000) 3 EGLR 41, Fluor Daniel Properties Ltd and ors v Shortlands Investments Ltd (2001) 2 EGLR 103, and Mason v Totalfinaelf UK Limited (2003) EWHC 1604 (Ch), to arrive at the conclusion that a covenant to maintain was only engaged where there is some form of physical deterioration; none of the cases… [read post]
15 Jul 2024, 1:05 am
Surveillance Islington Borough council passed a motion to stop the use of live facial recognition surveillance in the borough, joining Newham and Haringey Councils, who have passed similar motions. [read post]
7 Jul 2024, 8:50 am
The Court considered arguments that a mandatory order should not be made because of resource constraints and applied the Supreme Court decision of R (Imam) v Croydon London Borough Council (2023) UKSC 45, [2023] 3 WLR 1178 (“Imam”). [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 9:31 am
AK, R (On the Application Of) v Westminster City Council (2024) EWHC 769 (Admin) This was a judicial review of Westminster’s Allocation policy as it applied to ‘reciprocal transfers’ between another borough and Westminster. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 9:40 am
(The ‘exceptional needs or circumstances’ reference is to Holmes-Moorhouse v Richmond upon Thames London Borough Council (2009) UKHL 7 (our note)). [read post]
2 Jun 2024, 11:08 pm
The unconstitutional trial that President Trump was subjected to occurred in the most liberal borough, of the most liberal city, of one of the most liberal States in the country. [read post]
1 Jun 2024, 12:32 am
A highly partisan borough, Manhattan, of a highly partisan city, New York City, in a highly partisan state, like New York State, cannot be allowed to criminalize the conduct of presidential candidates in ways that violate the federal constitution. [read post]