Search for: "State v. Borough" Results 181 - 200 of 1,110
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jul 2016, 3:10 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
In this instance, the emergency action taken by the appellant was in response to the state of the pier, combined with a fear of possible collapse from crowd-loading during events. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 10:04 pm
The recent case of Asda Stores Ltd v Wandsworth London Borough Council [2007,] concerned the interpretation of a number of provisions in the Food Safety (General Food Hygiene) Regulations 1995 (“the Regulations”), which implemented Council Directive (EC) 93/43. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 8:20 pm
The recent case of Asda Stores Ltd v Wandsworth London Borough Council [2007,] concerned the interpretation of a number of provisions in the Food Safety (General Food Hygiene) Regulations 1995 (“the Regulations”), which implemented Council Directive (EC) 93/43. [read post]
9 Oct 2010, 9:04 pm
The recent case of Asda Stores Ltd v Wandsworth London Borough Council [2007,] concerned the interpretation of a number of provisions in the Food Safety (General Food Hygiene) Regulations 1995 (“the Regulations”), which implemented Council Directive (EC) 93/43. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 8:05 pm
The recent case of Asda Stores Ltd v Wandsworth London Borough Council [2007,] concerned the interpretation of a number of provisions in the Food Safety (General Food Hygiene) Regulations 1995 (“the Regulations”), which implemented Council Directive (EC) 93/43. [read post]
22 May 2009, 3:05 am
Yesiloz v London Borough of Southwark [2009] EWCA Civ 415 was concerned with whether a Turkish asylum seeker was entitled to housing benefit. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 3:51 pm by NL
Bubb v London Borough of Wandsworth [2011] EWCA Civ 1285In an appeal under s.204 Housing Act 1996, should the County Court determine disputed factual issues? [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 3:51 pm by NL
Bubb v London Borough of Wandsworth [2011] EWCA Civ 1285In an appeal under s.204 Housing Act 1996, should the County Court determine disputed factual issues? [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:19 pm by NL
Broxbourne Borough Council v Robb & Ors [2011] EWHC 1626 (QB) I'll give a somewhat lengthy report of this case, because it is one of the first to touch on the changing planning environment for Gypsies and travellers after the DCLG's stated intention to remove the Regional Plans and after Cala in the Court of Appeal (our brief report here). [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:19 pm by NL
Broxbourne Borough Council v Robb & Ors [2011] EWHC 1626 (QB) I'll give a somewhat lengthy report of this case, because it is one of the first to touch on the changing planning environment for Gypsies and travellers after the DCLG's stated intention to remove the Regional Plans and after Cala in the Court of Appeal (our brief report here). [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 5:56 am by NL
Bury Metropolitan Borough Council v Gibbons [2010] EWCA Civ 327 This was the Court of Appeal judgment on a second appeal from a s.204 Housing Act 1996 appeal in the County Court. [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Just before the Christmas break, however, the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in Clift v Slough Borough Council ([2010] EWCA Civ 1171). [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 9:18 am by Native American Rights Fund
Borough of Jim Thorpe.Public funding and the road to Damascus: the legacy of Employment Division v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 4:17 am by tracey
Supreme Court RT (Zimbabwe) & Ors v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 38 (25 July 2012) Perry & Ors v Serious Organised Crime Agency [2012] UKSC 35 (25 July 2012) Hewage v Grampian Health Board [2012] UKSC 37 (25 July 2012) T (Children), Re [2012] UKSC 36 (25 July 2012) Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council v Hickin [2012] UKSC 39 (25 July 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) EJ (Afghanistan) v Secretary of… [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 11:51 am by National Indian Law Library
United States (common law adoption)* State Courts BulletinCases featured:Williams v. [read post]
4 Aug 2024, 10:40 am by Giles Peaker
UO v London Borough of Redbridge (2024) EWHC 1989 (Admin) We first saw UO and Redbridge in this judicial review of an unlawful housing needs assessment (HNA) and suitability decision. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 10:50 am by Jeff O
Borough Council of Oakmont, 929 A.2d 1252, the Court ruled that a municipality could not regulate the location of a gas well through the denial of a conditional use permit and in Great Lakes Energy Partners v. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 10:37 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) McNeill, R. v [2008] EWCA Crim 553 (27 February 2008) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Mamki, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWCA Civ 307 (08 April 2008) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Gentoo Group Ltd & Anor v Hanratty [2008] EWHC 627 (QB) (07 April 2008) High Court (Administrative Court) The Mayor of London, R (on the application of) v First… [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 4:26 am by sally
High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) McKeown v British Horseracing Authority [2010] EWHC 508 (QB) (12 March 2010) High Court (Administrative Court) Rowe, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWHC 524 (Admin) (12 March 2010) Cooperative Group Ltd, R (on the application of) v Northumberland County Council [2010] EWHC 373 (Admin) (12 March 2010) Raw, R (on the application of) v London Borough of… [read post]