Search for: "State v. Borough" Results 181 - 200 of 1,317
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Oct 2007, 1:23 pm
Right then, Harouki v Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea [2007] EWCA Civ 1000. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 2:08 pm by David Smith
Macattram v Camden London Borough Council (2012) QBD (Admin) On Lawtel but no on BAILII This is an interesting little problem involving the payment of Council Tax. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 2:08 pm by David Smith
Macattram v Camden London Borough Council (2012) QBD (Admin) On Lawtel but no on BAILII This is an interesting little problem involving the payment of Council Tax. [read post]
17 Nov 2006, 5:25 am
With at least one Small Claims Court in each of New York State's 62 counties--including at least one in each of New York City's five boroughs--filing a small claims case is easy. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 3:10 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
In this instance, the emergency action taken by the appellant was in response to the state of the pier, combined with a fear of possible collapse from crowd-loading during events. [read post]
24 May 2011, 8:40 am by Cathyrn Hopkins, Olswang LLP
On 9 March 2011, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in the joint appeal of Sienkiewicz v Grief (UK) Ltd; Knowsley MBC v Willmore [2011] UKSC 10. [read post]
22 Nov 2009, 3:13 pm by NL
R (Neville) v London Borough of Wandsworth [2009] EWHC 2405 (Admin) [not on Bailii yet] This was a renewed application for permission for a Judicial Review of Wandsworth's refusal of a discretionary succession. [read post]
22 Nov 2009, 3:13 pm by NL
R (Neville) v London Borough of Wandsworth [2009] EWHC 2405 (Admin) [not on Bailii yet] This was a renewed application for permission for a Judicial Review of Wandsworth's refusal of a discretionary succession. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 10:27 am by Adam Wagner
Judgments were also published in non-anyonmised form – see Doncaster v Haigh and Doncaster v Watson. [read post]
22 Jun 2012, 5:01 am by FT
So the LL has a discretion as to whether to proceed further.The other case the Court in Stafford considered was Forbes v Lambeth London Borough Council[2003] EWHC 222 (QB). [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 8:20 pm
The recent case of Asda Stores Ltd v Wandsworth London Borough Council [2007,] concerned the interpretation of a number of provisions in the Food Safety (General Food Hygiene) Regulations 1995 (“the Regulations”), which implemented Council Directive (EC) 93/43. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 10:04 pm
The recent case of Asda Stores Ltd v Wandsworth London Borough Council [2007,] concerned the interpretation of a number of provisions in the Food Safety (General Food Hygiene) Regulations 1995 (“the Regulations”), which implemented Council Directive (EC) 93/43. [read post]
9 Oct 2010, 9:04 pm
The recent case of Asda Stores Ltd v Wandsworth London Borough Council [2007,] concerned the interpretation of a number of provisions in the Food Safety (General Food Hygiene) Regulations 1995 (“the Regulations”), which implemented Council Directive (EC) 93/43. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 8:05 pm
The recent case of Asda Stores Ltd v Wandsworth London Borough Council [2007,] concerned the interpretation of a number of provisions in the Food Safety (General Food Hygiene) Regulations 1995 (“the Regulations”), which implemented Council Directive (EC) 93/43. [read post]
22 May 2009, 3:05 am
Yesiloz v London Borough of Southwark [2009] EWCA Civ 415 was concerned with whether a Turkish asylum seeker was entitled to housing benefit. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:19 pm by NL
Broxbourne Borough Council v Robb & Ors [2011] EWHC 1626 (QB) I'll give a somewhat lengthy report of this case, because it is one of the first to touch on the changing planning environment for Gypsies and travellers after the DCLG's stated intention to remove the Regional Plans and after Cala in the Court of Appeal (our brief report here). [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:19 pm by NL
Broxbourne Borough Council v Robb & Ors [2011] EWHC 1626 (QB) I'll give a somewhat lengthy report of this case, because it is one of the first to touch on the changing planning environment for Gypsies and travellers after the DCLG's stated intention to remove the Regional Plans and after Cala in the Court of Appeal (our brief report here). [read post]
5 Apr 2017, 3:44 pm by Giles Peaker
London Borough of Islington v Dyer (2017) EWCA Civ 150 Termination of an introductory tenancy requires a notice under s.128 Housing Act 1996. [read post]
8 Aug 2015, 5:08 pm by Giles Peaker
” Ealing’s Allocation Policy stated, as noted in the judgment: f) Households that have not been resident in the Borough for the last 5 years. [read post]