Search for: "State v. Borough"
Results 261 - 280
of 1,111
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Oct 2018, 9:09 am
(Jurisdiction)State v. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 1:00 am
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 9:19 am
In Ladele v London Borough of Islington [2010] a Christian registrar refused to carry out civil partnership ceremonies on the basis that same sex relationships were contrary to her religious beliefs. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 2:30 pm
Thus, in the classic case of James v Eastleigh Borough Council [1990] 2 AC 751, the criterion used for allowing free entry to the council's swimming pool was not sex but statutory retirement age. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 2:30 pm
Thus, in the classic case of James v Eastleigh Borough Council [1990] 2 AC 751, the criterion used for allowing free entry to the council's swimming pool was not sex but statutory retirement age. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 4:10 am
KBBI News reports that an Alaska state trial court judge yesterday in Hunt v. [read post]
8 Oct 2018, 1:00 am
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 1:00 am
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
26 Aug 2018, 3:51 pm
McCarthy v. [read post]
16 Aug 2018, 6:15 pm
Nazareth Borough, 430 Pa. 255, 266-67 (Pa. 1968). [read post]
6 Aug 2018, 7:15 am
Reference was also made to the retirement-age swimming pool case, James v Eastleigh Borough Council [1990] 2 AC 751. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 1:00 am
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
29 Jul 2018, 6:28 pm
A constitutional challenge was raised almost immediately in East York (Borough) v. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 1:00 am
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 1:00 am
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 4:05 pm
” Rulings IPSO has published two resolution statements and series of rulings from the Complaints Committee: Resolution Statement 02597-18 Stewart v express.co.uk, resolved directly with publication Resolution Statement 02287-18 Jolley v Daily Record, resolved via IPSO mediation 19325-17 A woman v Dover Express, no breach after investigation 02514-18 Rochdale Borough Council v Rochdale Online, no breach after investigation 02623-18 Templeman… [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 3:43 am
The EAT noted firstly that the tribunal has not had the benefit of the recent decision of the EAT in Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council v Willetts (2018), (Holiday pay – Regular voluntary overtime should be included – 18 August 2017) which held that the overarching principle established by the case law is that “normal remuneration” must be maintained in respect of the period of annual leave guaranteed by Article 7. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 1:00 am
Williams & Anor v London Borough of Hackney, heard 14-15 Feb 2018. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 1:00 am
Williams & Anor v London Borough of Hackney, heard 14-15 Feb 2018. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 1:00 am
Williams & Anor v London Borough of Hackney, heard 14-15 Feb 2018. [read post]
