Search for: "State v. Borough"
Results 301 - 320
of 1,111
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Mar 2018, 5:30 pm
The Socially Aware blog has commented on the case of United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 1:17 am
Williams & Anor v London Borough of Hackney, heard 14-15 Feb 2018. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 6:14 am
We see how that all works out in a recent Second Circuit decision that upholds a New York City gun regulation against a Second Amendment challenge.The case is New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 1:00 am
Williams & Anor v London Borough of Hackney, heard 14-15 Feb 2018. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 1:00 am
Williams & Anor v London Borough of Hackney, heard 14-15 Feb 2018. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 6:04 am
Consortium v. [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 1:00 am
R (Stott) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 18 Jan 2018. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 11:17 am
In Borough of Duryea v. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 4:13 pm
The claimant stated that this did not happen. [read post]
13 Dec 2017, 7:44 am
Wolff; Donald V. [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 4:18 pm
Last Week in the Courts We understand the cases of Ellis v Wigan Council and Williams v London Borough of Croydon both settled in advance of the trials listed for 6 December 2017. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 10:44 am
Choc v. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 10:44 am
Choc v. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 2:04 pm
The court shall, however, revoke the nonresident's driving privilege to operate a motor vehicle in this State, in accordance with this section. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 3:31 am
Second, it may be noted that Dr Butt’s case raises questions similar to those considered by the Court of Appeal in Clift v Slough Borough Council [2011] 1 WLR 1774, namely the extent to which the Human Rights Act 1998 impacts upon defences available to public authorities to negate tortious liability. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 4:00 am
This type of provision, however, has survived in a number of collective bargaining agreement [see New York State Off. of Mental Health v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 53 A.D.3d 887].* Pursuant to OATH Rule of Practice section 1-49(d), respondent had requested that "Anonymous" be used in reporting this decision. [read post]
22 Oct 2017, 8:45 am
The court cited another state supreme court decision, 2015’s State v. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 3:52 am
Borough of Tenafly, 309 F.3d 144, 176 (3d Cir. 2002); ACLU of N.J. v. [read post]
4 Jul 2017, 7:03 am
The Supreme Court held that the Appeal Court had not applied the correct test from R (Bagdanavicius) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, which for threats from third parties is whether the state has failed to provide reasonable protection against harm inflicted by non-state agents. [read post]
8 May 2017, 1:00 am
R (Kiarie) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; R (Byndloss) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 15-16 February 2017. [read post]
