Search for: "State v. Borough" Results 361 - 380 of 1,314
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Dec 2017, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts We understand the cases of Ellis v Wigan Council and Williams v London Borough of Croydon both settled in advance of the trials listed for 6 December 2017. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 7:58 am by Giles Peaker
London Borough of Haringey v Ahmed & Anor (2017) EWCA Civ 1861 This was Haringey’s appeal of a High Court decision dismissing Haringey’s claim for possession against Ms Ahmed (our report here). [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 2:04 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
The court shall, however, revoke the nonresident's driving privilege to operate a motor vehicle in this State, in accordance with this section. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 3:31 am by INFORRM
Second, it may be noted that Dr Butt’s case raises questions similar to those considered by the Court of Appeal in Clift v Slough Borough Council [2011] 1 WLR 1774, namely the extent to which the Human Rights Act 1998 impacts upon defences available to public authorities to negate tortious liability. [read post]
29 Oct 2017, 3:47 pm by Giles Peaker
That settled accommodation forms such a ‘break’ was held in Din v Wandsworth London Borough Council [1983] 1 AC 657, as approved by the House of Lords in R v London Borough of Brent ex parte Awua [1996] 1 AC 55. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
This type of provision, however, has survived in a number of  collective bargaining agreement [see New York State Off. of Mental Health v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 53 A.D.3d 887].* Pursuant to OATH Rule of Practice section 1-49(d), respondent had requested that "Anonymous" be used in reporting this decision. [read post]
22 Oct 2017, 4:18 pm by Giles Peaker
Panayiotou v London Borough of Waltham Forest (2017) EWCA Civ 1624 This is an important court of appeal decision on the meaning of ‘significantly’ in Lord Neuberger’s definition of vulnerability under s.189(1)(c) Housing Act 1996 in Hotak v Southwark LBC (2015) UKSC 30, [2016] AC 811 (our report). [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 11:44 pm by Tessa Shepperson
London Borough of Camden v Foxtons Limited: [2017] The facts The London Borough of Camden (Camden) – one of the few Councils to actively pursue letting agents and seek to enforce the legislation (and good for them for doing it) were unhappy with Foxtons description of their fees as an ‘Administration Fee’ and proceeded to fine them. [read post]
23 Aug 2017, 11:59 pm by Tessa Shepperson
A recent case (not a housing case though) where rectification was ordered is Borough of Milton Keynes -v- Viridor (Community Recycling MK) Limited (No 2) [2017] (discussed here). [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 3:52 am by SHG
Borough of Tenafly, 309 F.3d 144, 176 (3d Cir. 2002); ACLU of N.J. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 1:55 pm by Giles Peaker
(Najim v London Borough of Enfield [2015] EWCA Civ 319; [2015] HLR 19) (…) The proper approach to be derived from such authorities, and Tranckle (R v Exeter City Council, ex p. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 2:28 pm by Giles Peaker
E, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Islington [2017] EWHC 1440 (Admin) E is a nine year old child, who brought the claim through her mother, C. [read post]
4 Jul 2017, 7:03 am by Poppy Rimington-Pounder
 The Supreme Court held that the Appeal Court had not applied the correct test from R (Bagdanavicius) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, which for threats from third parties is whether the state has failed to provide reasonable protection against harm inflicted by non-state agents. [read post]