Search for: "State v. Borough" Results 381 - 400 of 1,112
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2015, 7:40 am by Charlotte Garden
The Court applied a similar rule in the context of public employees’ petition rights in Borough of Duryea v. [read post]
   According to evidence provided in the case of Nzolameso v City of Westminster, in October 2013 48% of the temporary accommodation provided Westminster was outside the borough. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 1:54 am by admin2
Jason McCourty Titans Jersey Jurrell Casey Jersey As with public school students, veterans enrolled at private universities have access to funds from various GI Bill programs, depending on the length of service, dates served and other factors5 and 12, choose a snowboard that features a 26 cm waist width For users who wish a big and clear screen and good overall quality, this is the way to go I’ve struggled with wanting to leave you for months but my big heart didn’t want to hurt YOU or… [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 4:34 am by Christopher Brown, Matrix
On 25 February 2015, the Supreme Court handed down its judgments in R (oao Rotherham Metropolitan BC and Ors) v Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills [2015] UKSC 6. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 1:28 pm by Native American Rights Fund
United States (Federal Tort Claims Act; Drunk Driving; Wrongful Death)State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2015state.htmlCosentino v. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 3:02 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here: Thorpe Petition and Appendix (00059355) Question presented: The Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA) applies to “any” institution or state or local government agency that receives federal funds and “has possession of, or control over,” Native American human remains. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 5:22 am by Amy Knight, Arden Chambers
The House of Lords considered the effect of s 17(1) in Din (Taj) v Wandsworth LBC [1983] 1 AC 657, HL. [read post]
20 May 2015, 3:11 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Upon considering the rule in Din v Wandsworth London Borough Council [1983] 1 AC 657, Lord Reed reasoned that the review officer did not consider whether the cause of the appellant’s current state of homelessness was her surrender of her tenancy at the hostel. [read post]
18 May 2015, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Haile v London Borough of Waltham Forest, heard 29 January. [read post]
14 May 2015, 1:59 am by Justin Bates, Arden Chambers
In Mohammed v Manek and Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea (1995) 27 HLR 439, it was held that, as a general rule, accommodation made available for an applicant pending enquiries as to what (if any) duty was owed to him under Pt 7, Housing Act 1996, was not within the scope of s 3, so that an authority do not have to obtain a possession order before evicting an applicant. [read post]
8 May 2015, 7:00 am by Jocelyn Hutton
Hotak v London Borough of Southwark; Johnson v Solihull; and Kanu v London Borough of Southwark, heard on 15 December 2014. [read post]
4 May 2015, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Hotak v London Borough of Southwark; Johnson v Solihull; and Kanu v London Borough of Southwark, heard on 15 December 2014. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 1:12 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Hotak v London Borough of Southwark; Johnson v Solihull; and Kanu v London Borough of Southwark, heard on 15 December 2014. [read post]