Search for: "State v. Borough"
Results 401 - 420
of 1,322
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Dec 2011, 3:48 pm
London Borough of Islington v Boyle & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 1450This rather sad case was Islington’s appeal on the issue of whether Ms Boyle was occupying the flat she had under a secure tenancy as her ‘sole or principal home’. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 3:48 pm
London Borough of Islington v Boyle & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 1450This rather sad case was Islington’s appeal on the issue of whether Ms Boyle was occupying the flat she had under a secure tenancy as her ‘sole or principal home’. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 3:33 pm
Ceballos and Borough of Duryea v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 2:14 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) MD (Gambia), R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 121 (17 February 2011) Test Claimants In the Thin Cap Group Litigation v HM Revenue and Customs [2011] EWCA Civ 127 (18 February 2011) Axa Sun Life Services Plc v Campbell Martin Ltd & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 133 (18 February 2011) Welford v Transport for London [2011] EWCA Civ 129 (18 February 2011) Bayat Telephone… [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 3:30 pm
(G) v Barnet London Borough Council [2004] 2 AC 208 (HL(E)) establishes that it is not possible to carve out a section 17 duty to house families where children are already accommodated. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 3:30 pm
(G) v Barnet London Borough Council [2004] 2 AC 208 (HL(E)) establishes that it is not possible to carve out a section 17 duty to house families where children are already accommodated. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 3:13 pm
The court was persuaded In Wilson v First County Trust Ltd (No. 2) [2004] 1 AC 816, Lord Hope stated at paragraph 106:- “… Article I of the First Protocol has a similar character [to Article 6(1)]. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 3:29 am
On the other hand, the more recent case People v. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 9:01 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Zafar & Ors v R [2008] EWCA Crim 184 (13 February 2008) K v R [2008] EWCA Crim 185 (13 February 2008) JT v R. [2008] EWCA Crim 183 (12 February 2008) Kelly, R. v [2008] EWCA Crim 137 (08 February 2008) AS, R. v [2008] EWCA Crim 138 (08 February 2008) High Court (Administrative Court) Hansford v Southampton Magistrates’ Court [2008] EWHC 67 (Admin) (19 February 2008) Rashid, R (on the… [read post]
7 Mar 2021, 1:27 pm
Croydon London Borough Council v Kalonga (2021) EWCA Civ 77 This is the Court of Appeal judgment of Croydon’s appeal from the High Court decision that we noted here. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 1:17 pm
Nzamy v Brent London Borough Council Court of Appeal, January 26, 2011 [Arden eflash 420. [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 10:52 am
Croydon London Borough Council v Kalonga (2022) UKSC 7 In which the Supreme Court considered the position on termination of ‘flexible tenancies’ – fixed term secure tenancies – during the fixed term. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 10:53 am
Borough of Jim Thorpe. [read post]
21 May 2010, 3:25 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) L’Oreal SA & Ors v Bellure NV & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 535 (21 May 2010) Re W (Children) [2010] EWCA Civ 537 (20 May 2010) Groveholt Ltd v Hughes & Anor [2010] EWCA Civ 538 (20 May 2010) MJ (Angola) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWCA Civ 557 (20 May 2010) Condron, R (on the application of) v Merthyr Tydfil County Borough Council & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 534 (20 May 2010) Nessa… [read post]
3 Nov 2019, 11:50 am
This would be ‘manifestly without reasonable foundation’, following R (Turley) v Wandsworth LBC (2017) EWCA Civ 189, (2017) HLR 21 and R (DA) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (2019) UKSC 21. [read post]
10 Nov 2013, 7:38 am
London Borough of Wandsworth v NJ [2013] EWCA Civ 1373NJ applied as homeless to Wandsworth. [read post]
10 Nov 2013, 7:38 am
London Borough of Wandsworth v NJ [2013] EWCA Civ 1373NJ applied as homeless to Wandsworth. [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 9:35 am
Metropolitan Housing Trust Ltd v TM (2021) EWCA Civ 1890 We saw in Taylor v Slough Borough Council (2020) EWHC 3520 (Ch) (our note) that in possession claims where a defence of breach of public sector equality duty was raised, the courts would be prepared to accept subsequent compliance (even after the issue of proceedings) as ‘remedying’ the breach. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 2:59 pm
Wolfe’s Borough Coffee, Inc., the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed the decision of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (“Starbucks V”) concluding that Starbucks failed to prove that the defendant’s use of the marks MISTER CHARBUCKS and CHARBUCKS BLEND is likely to dilute Starbucks’s famous marks including, of course, STARBUCKS. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 2:56 am
Supreme Court Gisda Cyf v Barratt [2010] UKSC 41 (13 October 2010) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Shah v R [2010] EWCA Crim 2326 (13 October 2010) Dorset County Council v House (Rev 1) [2010] EWCA Crim 2270 (13 October 2010) O & H, R v [2010] EWCA Crim 2233 (13 October 2010) King v Secretary of State for Justice [2010] EWCA Crim 2522 (13 October 2010) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Broomleigh Housing Association Ltd v… [read post]
