Search for: "State v. Borough" Results 401 - 420 of 1,314
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2017, 3:05 pm by Giles Peaker
Osman, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Harrow (2017) EWHC 274 (Admin) A challenge to Harrow’s allocation policy, specifically on the ‘downgrading’ of allocation priority for overcrowded households in PRS accommodation, while existing Harrow tenants kept the higher priority for overcrowding on a transfer application. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 3:03 pm by Whitney Roy
The state of Alaska also claimed the Service failed to adequately respond to its public comments, as required by the Act’s state cooperation provisions. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Poshteh v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea, heard 14 February 2017. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Tuesday 14 February, the Supreme Court will hear the appeal of Poshteh v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 2:05 pm by Giles Peaker
Bayani (1990) 22 HLR 406, and Cramp v Hastings Borough Council [2005] H.L.R. 48. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 9:21 am by Ron Coleman
Whether parody is properly identified before or after conducting the six-factor dilution analysis stated in § 1125(c)(2)(B), see generally Starbucks Corp. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 2:14 pm by Giles Peaker
The question, in large part, was the significance of Lord Neuberger’s judgment in Hotak v Southwark London Borough Council; Kanu v Southwark London Borough Council [2016] AC 811, at paras 78 and 79 “78. [read post]
21 Jan 2017, 9:12 pm by Patricia Salkin
Northeast Pennsylvania SMSA Limited Partnership v The Throop Borough Zoning Hearing Board, 2017 WL 56124 (PA Cmwlth unrep. 1/5/2017)  Filed under: Current Caselaw, Wireless Communications [read post]
15 Jan 2017, 11:37 am by Giles Peaker
Royal Borough of Kensington And Chelsea, R (On the Application Of) v London Borough Of Ealing [2017] EWHC 24 (Admin) A judicial review in which two local authorities fought over which of them was gong to have to owe a housing duty to a homeless applicant. [read post]
2 Jan 2017, 4:12 pm by INFORRM
There were three “damages only” trials Undre v London Borough of Harrow (No.2) [2016] EWHC 2761 (QB) (Sir David Eady) – damages of £9,000 were awarded after the acceptance of an offer of amends. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 3:13 pm by Giles Peaker
The court was persuaded In Wilson v First County Trust Ltd (No. 2) [2004] 1 AC 816, Lord Hope stated at paragraph 106:- “… Article I of the First Protocol has a similar character [to Article 6(1)]. [read post]
18 Dec 2016, 9:37 pm by Patricia Salkin
Horvath Towers III, LLC v Zoning Hearing Board of Montoursville Borough, 2016 WL 6087860 (MD PA 10/18/2016)Filed under: Current Caselaw, Wireless Communications [read post]
30 Nov 2016, 5:39 am by Michael DeRose
Both PERC and the appeals court relied heavily on the Supreme Court’s 2015 ruling in Borough of Keyport v. [read post]
27 Nov 2016, 2:14 pm by Giles Peaker
In the review, she stated, for the first time, that her sons had a fear of heights and that living on the 11th floor was impacting their mental health. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 9:18 am by Native American Rights Fund
Borough of Jim Thorpe.Public funding and the road to Damascus: the legacy of Employment Division v. [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 6:37 pm by Kenneth Vercammen, Esq.
"Bongiovanni stated he spoke with Nella on several occasions after her husband died and suggested to her that she execute a new will. [read post]