Search for: "State v. Borough" Results 61 - 80 of 1,316
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2023, 2:19 am by Matrix Law
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard… [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 2:18 am by Matrix Law
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard… [read post]
2 Apr 2023, 11:13 am by Giles Peaker
” The review decision barely dealt with this, stating: “140. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 2:47 am by Matrix Law
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard… [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:25 am by INFORRM
 Data privacy and data protection The ICO has issued the London Borough of Lewisham Council with an enforcement notice for its failure to respond to 338 overdue requests made under the Freedom of Information Act 2000. [read post]
26 Mar 2023, 8:53 am by Giles Peaker
Tapper v Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames (unreported, 4 January 2022, County Court at Central London, HHJ Parfitt) This was a section 204 Housing Act 1996 (‘HA 1996’) appeal against a review decision finding that the Appellant was intentionally homeless. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 2:13 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard… [read post]
13 Mar 2023, 2:44 am by Matrix Law
Z o.o. and others v Jakubowski and others, heard 28th February 2023 Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks, heard 2nd March 2023 The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v United Utilites Water Ltd No 2, heard 6th March 2023 London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, heard 7th March 2023 R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates Court and another, heard… [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 3:16 am by Matrix Law
On Tuesday 7th and Wednesday 8th March 2023 the Court will hear the case of London Borough of Merton Council v Nuffield Health Ltd, on appeal from [2021] EWCA Civ 826. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 12:51 pm by Giles Peaker
Davies v Bridgend County Borough Council (2023) EWCA Civ 80 – the Court of Appeal on residual diminution in value/blight in nuisance cases (here Japanese knotweed) – it is not ‘pure economic loss, and is recoverable in damages. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 5:28 am by CMS
High Court appeal by numerous local authorities (including Wolverhampton City Council) In London Borough of Barking and Dagenham, Other Local Authorities v Persons Unknown, Other named Defendants v London Gypsies and Travellers, Friends, Families and Travellers, National Federation of Gypsy Liaison Groups [2021] EWHC 1201 (QB), the High Court considered issues in relation to “traveller injunctions”. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 10:59 am by Giles Peaker
Secondly, via Williams v London Borough of Southwark (2000) All ER (D) 377, a commission could be retained where it was a payment for work done. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
” I have no particular brief for high Federalists from New England, but I do wonder what we might think had Garrison actually been influential and several New England states accepted his view and tried to secede, say, after the Supreme Court’s decision in Prigg v. [read post]
14 Dec 2022, 6:04 am by Matrix Law
The Secretary of State’s Planning Inspector allowed the respondent’s appeal against Swindon’s refusal of the certificate. [read post]