Search for: "State v. Borough"
Results 101 - 120
of 1,314
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2012, 6:37 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 5:15 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) FJ Chalke Ltd & Anor v Revenue & Customs [2010] EWCA Civ 313 (25 March 2010) Mason v Richard Freeman & Co (a firm) [2010] EWCA Civ 287 (25 March 2010) Bury Metropolitan Borough Council v Gibbons [2010] EWCA Civ 327 (26 March 2010) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Kirman, R. v [2010] EWCA Crim 614 (25 March 2010) High Court (Administrative Court) London Borough of Hillingdon & Ors, R (on the… [read post]
10 May 2012, 1:56 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Helena Partnerships Ltd v HM Revenue and Customs [2012] EWCA Civ 569 (09 May 2012) Barker v Hambleton District Council [2012] EWCA Civ 610 (09 May 2012) London Borough of Enfield v Outdoor Plus Ltd & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 608 (09 May 2012) Slater v Stephen Mark St Patrick Condappa [2012] EWCA Civ 598 (09 May 2012) Owen Ernest Wood & Ors v Hudson Industrial Services Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 599 (09 May 2012) LE… [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 2:58 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Gurung v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 62 (02 February 2012) Aksu v London Borough of Enfield [2012] EWCA Civ 60 (02 February 2012) County Leasing Asset Management Ltd & Anor v Michael Green Plant Ltd & Ors [2012] EWCA Civ 53 (02 February 2012) UG (Nepal) & Ors v Entry Clearance Officer [2012] EWCA Civ 58 (02 February 2012) Leeds City Council v Price &… [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 3:50 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Crocs Europe BV v Anderson & Anor (t/a Spectrum Agencies) [2012] EWCA Civ 1400 (30 October 2012) McCarrick v Hunter [2012] EWCA Civ 1399 (30 October 2012) Joyce v Epsom and Ewell Borough Council [2012] EWCA Civ 1398 (30 October 2012) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Gregory v Benham [2012] EWHC 2971 (QB) (26 October 2012) Joseph & Ors v Spiller & Anor [2012] EWHC 2958 (QB) (26 October 2012)… [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 2:32 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Ngyuen, R v [2008] EWCA Crim 585 (18 March 2008) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Mayor of London v London Borough of Enfield [2008] EWCA Civ 202 (18 March 2008) LG (Italy) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWCA Civ 190 (18 March 2008) S v Floyd [2008] EWCA Civ 201 (18 March 2008) Housden & Anor v The Conservators of Wimbledon and Putney Commons [2008] EWCA Civ 200 (18 March… [read post]
26 Oct 2018, 2:00 am
The case, Manhattan Community Access Corp v Halleck, involves whether private operators of public access channels are state actors subject to constitutional liability under the First Amendment. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 8:02 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Ministry of Defence v Cartner [2011] EWCA Civ 1516 (08 December 2011) Country Style Foods Ltd v Bouzir [2011] EWCA Civ 1519 (08 December 2011) Cusack v London Borough of Harrow [2011] EWCA Civ 1514 (07 December 2011) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) MO, & Ors, R. v [2011] EWCA Crim 2854 (08 December 2011) High Court (Administrative Court) Bates, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for… [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 10:00 am
United States and McDonnell v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 7:09 am
Supreme Court Russell & Ors v Transocean International Resources Ltd & Ors (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 57 (7 December 2011) Aberdeen City Council v Stewart Milne Group Ltd (Scotland) [2011] UKSC 56 (7 December 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) London Borough of Islington v Boyle & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 1450 (06 December 2011) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) McKeown v Attheraces Ltd [2011] EWHC 3232 (QB) (07 December 2011) High… [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 9:42 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Dickins v O2 Plc [2008] EWCA Civ 1144 (16 October 2008) Secretary of State for Business Enterprise & Regulatory Reform v Aaron & Ors [2008] EWCA Civ 1146 (16 October 2008) Simms v London Borough of Islington [2008] EWCA Civ 1083 (16 October 2008) Allied Domecq (Holdings) Ltd v Allied Domecq First Pension Trust Ltd & Anor [2008] EWCA Civ 1084 (16 October 2008) Court of Appeal (Criminal… [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 3:45 am
On Wednesday 14th December the Supreme Court will hand down judgment in the case of DB Symmetry Ltd and another v Swindon Borough Council, on appeal from [2020] EWCA Civ 1331. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 6:39 am
App’x 55 (2d Cir. 2015); Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 5:29 am
It stated that there should be a two-step process for evaluating potential zoning changes. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 6:08 am
Today, in Borough of Duryea v. [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 1:28 pm
United States (Federal Tort Claims Act; Drunk Driving; Wrongful Death)State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2015state.htmlCosentino v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 4:15 am
The complaint (full text) in Damato v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 2:24 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Page & Anor v Hewetts Solicitors & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 805 (15 June 2012) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Mabanga v Ophir Energy Plc & Anor [2012] EWHC 1589 (QB) (15 June 2012) London Borough of Southwark v Ofogba [2012] EWHC 1620 (QB) (15 June 2012) High Court (Chancery Division) Dalriada Trustees Ltd v Woodward & Ors [2012] EWHC 21626 (Ch) (15 June 2012) High Court (Family Division) The… [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 1:47 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) London Borough of Harrow v Ibrahim & Anor [2008] EWCA Civ 386 (21 April 2008) High Court (Chancery Division) Buhler AG v FP Spomax SA [2008] EWHC 823 (Ch) (21 April 2008) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Cotton (t/a Allmat Enterprises) v Rickard Metals Inc [2008] EWHC 824 (QB) (21 April 2008) High Court (Administrative Court) Farah, R (on the application of) v General Medical Council [2008] EWHC 731… [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 1:25 pm
Mohamed v Hammersmith and Fulham London Borough Council (2002) 1 AC 547, Omar v Westminster City Council (2008) HLR 36 (our report), Abed v City of Westminster (2011) EWCA Civ 1406 (our report), and Temur v Hackney LBC (2014) HLR 39 (our report) had all variously held that the facts relevant at review were those that pertained at the date of the review, not at the date of the original decision. [read post]
