Search for: "State v. Borough" Results 141 - 160 of 974
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Aug 2014, 2:36 pm by Giles Peaker
They are not the only London council to consider five years residence requirement – so are LB Southwark – but their stated reason for the increase is specifically because: Increased costs in inner London combined with restrictions on housing benefit has resulted in more households moving to outer London boroughs like Barnet. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 1:25 pm by NL
A very welcome guest report on this s.204 Housing Act 1996 Appeal by Alice Hilken of 1 Pump Court, who acted for the appellant, instructed by Rahman & Co.Kumaning v London Borough of Haringey December 2011, Central London County Court, HHJ SaggersonThe Appellant (A) was a British Citizen of Ghanaian origin who had lived in the U.K for over 15 years. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 1:25 pm by NL
A very welcome guest report on this s.204 Housing Act 1996 Appeal by Alice Hilken of 1 Pump Court, who acted for the appellant, instructed by Rahman & Co.Kumaning v London Borough of Haringey December 2011, Central London County Court, HHJ SaggersonThe Appellant (A) was a British Citizen of Ghanaian origin who had lived in the U.K for over 15 years. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 11:11 pm by NL
The ground 1 claim was on the basis of clause 31 of the post 2009 tenancy agreement, which states:“This is a list of things that you, your lodgers, friends, relatives, visitors and any other person living in the property are not allowed to do whilst in the London Borough of Wandsworth or the area which is local to the property: . breach the tenancy conditions . do anything which causes or is likely to cause a nuisance to anyone living in the borough of Wandsworth… [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 11:11 pm by NL
The ground 1 claim was on the basis of clause 31 of the post 2009 tenancy agreement, which states:“This is a list of things that you, your lodgers, friends, relatives, visitors and any other person living in the property are not allowed to do whilst in the London Borough of Wandsworth or the area which is local to the property: . breach the tenancy conditions . do anything which causes or is likely to cause a nuisance to anyone living in the borough of Wandsworth… [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 5:00 am
TortTalkers may recall a previous Tort Talk post on the case of Cost v. [read post]
12 May 2012, 5:15 am by NL
Huang v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] 2 A.C. 167 and Pinnock adopted. [read post]
12 May 2012, 5:15 am by NL
Huang v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] 2 A.C. 167 and Pinnock adopted. [read post]
11 Oct 2008, 10:50 pm
Teixeira v London Borough of Lambeth [2008] EWCA Civ 1088 is a Court of Appeal hearing, referring questions about right of residence under Art 12 of Regulation (EEC) 1612/68 to the European Court. [read post]
24 Oct 2017, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
This type of provision, however, has survived in a number of  collective bargaining agreement [see New York State Off. of Mental Health v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 53 A.D.3d 887].* Pursuant to OATH Rule of Practice section 1-49(d), respondent had requested that "Anonymous" be used in reporting this decision. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 12:22 pm
Manchester City Council v Moran & Richards v Ipswich Borough Council [2008] EWCA Civ 378 This is a very important Court of Appeal judgment, which will have significant impact on Women’s Refuges and women fleeing domestic violence. [read post]
20 May 2021, 2:30 am by S S
Hot on the heels of the decision in R (Imam) v London Borough of Croydon (2021) EWHC 739 (Admin) (see our note here) comes this altogether more satisfying decision, Elkundi & Ors, R (On the Application Of) v Birmingham City Council (2021) EWHC 1024 (Admin), on the nature and enforceability of the duty under s. 193(2) Housing Act 1996. [read post]
8 May 2011, 3:25 pm by NL
TG, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Lambeth (Shelter Intervening) [2011] EWCA Civ 526 The disconnection between Local Authority Social Services and housing departments has been a frequent topic here and in the courts, not least in the House of Lords decisions in R (G) v Southwark LBC [2009] UKHL 26 and R (M) v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC [2008] UKHL 14. [read post]
8 May 2011, 3:25 pm by NL
TG, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Lambeth (Shelter Intervening) [2011] EWCA Civ 526 The disconnection between Local Authority Social Services and housing departments has been a frequent topic here and in the courts, not least in the House of Lords decisions in R (G) v Southwark LBC [2009] UKHL 26 and R (M) v Hammersmith and Fulham LBC [2008] UKHL 14. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 1:39 pm by Giles Peaker
Both are Article 14 discrimination based, with disabilities meaning a bedroom could not be shared, one adult partners and the other a non-dependant requiring overnight care 2 mights a week.There is also an Upper Tribunal decision, LA v Bury Metropolitan Borough Council (HB) [2013] UKUT 546 (AAC). [read post]